Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Home on the range where the buffalo roam -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (10476)	2/18/2003 1:07:15 PM
From: im a survivor	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 13815

what about aol? I used to own it but sold it. Thought about buying some back, but the FUD cloud has prevented me from doing so to this point. got lots of cash. I like seeing all this green, but I want to put my money to work at lower prices.......

To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (10476)	2/18/2003 1:26:12 PM
From: Sig	Respond to of 13815

LU IMO these stocks are all garbage LU Great group of scientists must be supported by the govmt losing shirts for shareloders NT was canadian co, how did they lose $40 bil$. They are either real stupid or even crooks.going for future big tax loss carry-forwards GLW again , do not know the value of a $, pottery makers were way over their heads, now much competition and going to 100 channels per fiber vs only one means buyers only need 1 /100 as much fiber as originally thought AOL The worst, monstrous advertizing , trying to get everyone signed up and then try the old phone company trick raise the rates out the gazoo. Might have worked but its a new world- people would not put up with new higher rates Now they are trying to stay alive by providing "additional services", and charge for them No guarantees that will work either, as Msft is competiing Sig Even i fI am wrong, and they do well,there are better chances out there to make money