SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: tejek who wrote (161502)2/18/2003 3:24:12 PM
From: brian1501  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1574491
 
Its not how many he has to kill but how is his ruthlessness worst than of the dictator in Nigeria or Burma or NK or Saudi Arabia or at least another five countries on this planet?

Do you honestly expect the dictators of those countries (save NK) from gaining WMD? NK is a problem because it already has WMD, Iraq is a problem because it's pursuing nukes and has bio/chem. It's not very smart to allow Iraq to continue to develop it's WMD under that regime.

I fully expect he's producing all the chem/bio weapons he wants at this very moment, even with inspectors in country.

Brian



To: tejek who wrote (161502)2/18/2003 3:24:49 PM
From: i-node  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1574491
 
Its not how many he has to kill but how is his ruthlessness worst than of the dictator in Nigeria or Burma or NK or Saudi Arabia or at least another five countries on this planet?

You may not have noticed but, aside from NK (which is on the list), these other places do not pose national security threats to the United States.