SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : DON'T START THE WAR -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Richaaard who wrote (9920)2/18/2003 4:00:24 PM
From: ajax99  Respond to of 25898
 
I didn't like Clinton - I believed Bush jr would be better - maybe it's just the system - to much power concentrated in the presidency - the constitution tries to guard against it. It seems to be a natural progression.

>>>Power Corrupts<<<

Bush is a very very powerful man - perhaps the most powerful man in the history of the world - no he is the most powerful man in the world has ever seen - it is dangerous for anyone to have that much power - there is no balance of power as there was with the USSR - I know Saddam has done many evil things but most were in the Past - the USA cannot change the past



To: Richaaard who wrote (9920)2/18/2003 4:07:22 PM
From: Art Bechhoefer  Respond to of 25898
 
Richaaard, one thing I've noticed from those who think a war is just a great idea to get the job done: None of the warmongers gives a hoot, or is willing to admit to the cost of a war in terms of dollars over the next ten years, dead bodies, and bad PR (which in the investment world usually results in a special write off of impaired assets). Why don't you give us some numbers so that we might have confidence that war is the best alternative?


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News