To: Just_Observing who wrote (10002 ) 2/18/2003 8:16:34 PM From: AK2004 Respond to of 25898 JO you are not observing very well,..... re; were off by a factor of at least 100 do you understand such simple things as fair value or present value of stream of cash flows? It does not take a rocket scientist to understand that...... I am right on target in my area of expertise re: If you had any shame, you would never post on SI why is that because you can not read and understand? I do not believe that it is my responsibility to teach you re: Now, you insult Len Grasso one of the most decent people on SI maybe you do consider neo nazis to be most decent people but I disagree with you on that re: Too stupid to know you are stupid. Too shameless to know shame wait a sec, it took will power on my part not to call you a moron yet (and you're a moron oops) but you are making it harder harder for me <ggggg> re:Congratulations in your continuing consistency in being completely wrong. well, let see, since you are of a very limited mental capacity (again I restrained myself from simply calling you a moron <g>) lets estimate PV of the increasing cash flow as a multiple of the current cash flow by 100 to 500 which would be at least (600+700)*50=? now you can take your calculator out (clue if you are getting less than 600 or less than 100 you might be wrong <g> )the lowest would be 130 billions and likely at least 3x of that. now from the article that I posted UN wants 70B annual with its PV of at least 30x which would be 2.1T and if you count the damage to economy you can safely multiply it by 10x or 21 trillion I know that you very slow (again resisted the temptation of calling you a moron) but I hope you can count zeros $21,000,000,000,000 what the hell, lets be honest - You are MORON