Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : DON'T START THE WAR -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Dr. Doktor who wrote (10026)	2/18/2003 8:19:09 PM
From: PartyTime	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 25898

Bush, and you, would lose that argument in a fair court. UN Resolution 1441 is no provision for war. The operative of that resolution is for inspections to continue with reports back to the council and failing satisfactory results there could be serious consequences. In no way do "serious consequences" mean there is an opening door for the US to wage war. What the US wanted, more than anything, when it got its 1441 vote was for everyone to get on board, including Syria. If 1441 was meant as a war vehicle, it would ot have been approved by all 15 members of the Security Council. This is clear.