SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Condor who wrote (75532)2/19/2003 10:20:50 AM
From: aladin  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 281500
 
C,

No one discussed nuking North Korea, except in the case of a North Korean nuclear launch.

The discussion centered on taking out (no mention of nukes) the North Korean weapons plants.

The nuclear counterattack if they launched is a given. I just wish it was unnecessary - that a missile defense system could (already) be in place for Japan and North America. Then we could just go after command and control with conventional weapons.

A lot of liberals and Democratic senators have been pushing this - almost as an alternative to Iraq. Or as an argument - if you won't attack NKorea - why Iraq?

The answer is - in due time. The UN discussions before Iraq. Other diplomacy before North Korea (probably involving the Chinese).

John



To: Condor who wrote (75532)2/19/2003 10:23:53 AM
From: LindyBill  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 281500
 
You're suggestion is to "Roll the Dice" and nuke North Korea and you accuse me of not wanting to discuss the matter seriously. Earth to LB....come in....Earth to LB!!


Please don't attempt to "Smear" me like that, Condor. I said take out the reprocessing site. That is a conventional bombing using JDAM's. We can do it tomorrow if we wanted. Any "Nuking" by us would come only if they employed Nukes first.