SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : DON'T START THE WAR -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: PartyTime who wrote (10341)2/19/2003 12:55:23 PM
From: Lazarus_Long  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 25898
 
Without those troops, the inspectors you so love would not be within a thousand miles of Baghdad. And you d**n well know it. And the U2 overflights wouldn't be happening. Saddam did that in response to Bush ratcheting up the pressure. The ONLY thing Saddam understands is force.

Too early? 2-3 weeks more, I think. Then the shooting starts.

Check back then.

Now, he's in the quagmire of a situation where you'll blame people carrying peace signs and not even begin to acknowledge, or at least consider that perhaps it's Bush himself who got too stupid in this.
OTOH, maybe it was the idiot kneejerk liberal pacifists. Had the US and the West presented a united front, Saddam would be sipping a piña colada in Tripoli and this all would be history.



To: PartyTime who wrote (10341)2/19/2003 2:34:39 PM
From: Lazarus_Long  Respond to of 25898
 
Laz, you don't think Bush prematurely committed too, too many troops a bit too early?
How can ANYTHING be too early for you? Your answer is never, not ever, under any circumstances.

"Take your stand at the Rio Grande."