SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Jagfan who wrote (361373)2/19/2003 4:35:35 PM
From: Tadsamillionaire  Respond to of 769670
 
US considers 'mini-nukes'
By Ben Leapman, Political Reporter, Evening Standard
19 February 2003
American defence chiefs are drafting secret plans for a new generation of nuclear weapons, in a move which could set back attempts to win international backing for a war in Iraq.
Leaked Pentagon plans suggest that the new devices could include "mini-nukes" which would be considered more "usable" than giant warheads, making them more effective as a deterrent.

American government officials acknowledged the authenticity of the leaked papers but said their contents were "what-if scenarios and very long range planning".

The move will be seized on by opponents of American policy towards Iraq, who will cite the weapons plans as another example of President Bush acting with disregard for world opinion and for internat ional treaties on nuclear nonproliferation.

In Britain, Labour MPs are certain to use the revelations to press their case that Tony Blair should be far more cautious in his dealings with the American administration.

Opinion polls show that many Britons already see President Bush as a bigger threat to world peace than Saddam Hussein.

A paper published by US Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld last year identified potential targets for American nuclear weapons and raised questions over what kind of armaments would be best suited to the purpose. The leaked papers show that a "future arsenal panel" will meet in August at the Omaha headquarters of the US Strategic Command to consider "requirements for low-yield weapons, earth-penetrating weapons, enhanced radiation weapons, agent defeat weapons".

Some of the newgeneration weapons would be "bunker-busters" allowing enemy stock of conventional, chemical or biological weapons to be destroyed in their underground stores.

Building the new nuclear devices would risk breaching a range of treaties.

Greg Mello of Los Alamos Study Group, an American nuclear watchdog organisation which obtained the leaked papers, said: "It is impossible to overstate the challenge these plans pose to the comprehensive testban treaty, the existing nuclear test moratorium and US compliance with article six of the nuclear non-proliferation treaty."

The looming row over the nuclear plans echoes the controversy over America's plans for a "star wars" missile defence shield, first floated by President Ronald Reagan and revived by President Bush.

The missile defence programme has already sparked a round of Labour infighting, with the Government overriding objections from many backbench MPs to approve the siting of equipment on British soil.

thisislondon.com.



To: Jagfan who wrote (361373)2/19/2003 5:23:37 PM
From: ThirdEye  Respond to of 769670
 
No. I'm saying it's being very hard to wage a PR campaign to justify pre-emption right now. Between Blix and the French, the spectre of thousands of innocents dying in a massive bombardment, the cost and the economic consequences, we need to find harder evidence than we currently have.