SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Auric Goldfinger's Short List -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: RockyBalboa who wrote (11115)2/19/2003 6:18:27 PM
From: StockDung  Respond to of 19428
 
St. Paul man buried investors in spam, feds say
Terry Fiedler
Star Tribune

Published Feb. 19, 2003 SPAM19

A call to Samuel Meltzer's St. Paul home is greeted with the message that he doesn't want to be bothered by solicitations.

But in what could be considered an extreme case of "Do as I say, not as I do," federal authorities are accusing Meltzer of sending millions of unsolicited e-mail messages as part of a fraudulent scheme to promote at least a dozen penny stocks.

Meltzer received at least $159,600 in stock and cash from 1998-2001 for spreading false and misleading information about the companies, according to a civil suit filed Tuesday in federal court in New York by the Securities and Exchange Commission. The SEC labeled him a "professional Internet spammer."

SEC spokesman Mark Schonfeld said this isn't the first time the SEC has gone after people who spread misleading information on the Internet. But he added that the case is "a little unusual" because it is "another rung down the ladder" from the issuers of the stock and stock promoters to an individual who simply disseminated the stock promoters' information.

In a brief interview Tuesday, Meltzer, 37, said he hadn't seen the complaint. "This is a surprise," he added.

His lawyer, Daniel Boivin, said Meltzer provided a disclaimer with each e-mail that raised the issue of his compensation and possible conflicts of interest.

"The SEC wants complete disclosure and he's giving complete disclosure," Boivin said. He said Meltzer is essentially a one-man operation who rents computer server time for mass mailings.

The SEC said Meltzer owned and operated two companies during the time period addressed in its complaint: a Minnesota corporation, Hoek Industries Inc.; and a Nevada corporation, Interstock Inc.

Both companies offered Web hosting, design and unsolicited e-mail ad services.

Besides sending the unsolicited e-mails, the SEC said Meltzer created numerous Web sites to spread misinformation given to him by stock promoters. To conceal his identity -- and avoid the detection of Web hosts seeking to stop Internet spam -- Meltzer operated under at least 30 different assumed Internet identities, the SEC said.

The suit accuses him of two counts of fraud and asks that he be barred from similar activity, repay the money gained through the fraud plus interest, and pay an undisclosed civil penalty.

The SEC's Schonfeld said the agency had received numerous comments in the past few years in its Internet complaint center about stock-related spam in which the messages seemed to use consistent language. An investigation led back to Meltzer.

"He certainly has a vast Internet presence," Schonfeld said.

The suit says Meltzer falsely said his e-mail recommendations represented his investment opinions based on his review of the issuer's filings and his interviews with company managements. Instead, he simply republished recommendations and representations that he received from the promoters who hired him, the SEC said.

Through his e-mails and Web sites, Meltzer made false and misleading representations concerning the stock issuers' business and projections of future performance that had no reasonable basis in fact, the SEC said.

The complaint said the fraud applied to at least a dozen companies that were quoted on the over-the-counter bulletin board, including CityView Energy Corp. Ltd. in Burswood, Western Australia; Cayuga, Ontario-based Bach-Hauser Inc.; Envirokare Tech Inc. in Las Vegas; and Delray Beach, Fla.-based SilkBotanicals.com Inc.

Meltzer "flooded the Internet with touts" concerning CityView beginning in December 1999 through February 2001, the SEC said, in many cases directing people to at least five Web sites he had set up to further praise the stock. The SEC said Meltzer told potential investors that, after speaking with management, he had determined that the gas-and-oil company was a potential takeover target worth 10 times its value. He noted that revenue was likely to leap from about $2 million in 2002 to nearly $40 million by 2004.

Though the complaint says the touts had no basis, the stock price rose more than 12 percent to $2.50 a share between December 1999 and January 2000 after Meltzer's first spam. Similar price increases occurred after other e-mail efforts.

In February 2001, Melzer recommended Envirokare on a Web site and projected annual income for the manufacturer of plastic pallets of $2.2 million in 2001 and $4.3 million in 2002, the SEC said. According to public filings, though, Envirokare was a development-stage company that had reported no revenue since its inception in 1998.

With SilkBotanicals.com (formerly Diversified Restaurant Holdings and now a marketer of artificial flowers) Meltzer is said to have touted the company with e-mails directing investors to a Web site, stock-researcher.com.

The e-mails in April 2000 projected potential sales for the company of more than $50 million a year, while the Web site predicted 2001 revenue of $11.9 million.

In reality, SilkBotanicals.com had negative working capital, a stockholders' deficit and said that as of May 1999 it had not yet begun any marketing or distribution, the SEC said.

-- Terry Fiedler is at tfiedler@startribune.com.



To: RockyBalboa who wrote (11115)2/19/2003 6:30:07 PM
From: StockDung  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 19428
 
Sam & Adam Meltzer / Stock & Mortgage Spammers Index

spamhaus.org

About ROKSO | Information For Spammers

Sam & Adam Meltzer / Stock & Mortgage Spammers Index

[1194] Sam & Adam Meltzer / Stock & Mortgage Spammers - Main Info
[2109] Sam & Adam Meltzer / Stock & Mortgage Spammers - Hoek Industries
[2302] Sam & Adam Meltzer / Stock & Mortgage Spammers - LEGAL: SEC Charges Minnesota Man With Stock Fraud
[2300] Sam & Adam Meltzer / Stock & Mortgage Spammers - LEGAL: SEC: St. Paul man buried investors in spam
[1912] Sam & Adam Meltzer / Stock & Mortgage Spammers - LEGAL: Spammers Are Target of AG Lawsuit
[2303] Sam & Adam Meltzer / Stock & Mortgage Spammers - Nevada Compay
[2110] Sam & Adam Meltzer / Stock & Mortgage Spammers - Oscar Patterson

Main Info
These guys have been at it since 1997!!! Sites hosted with most of the know spamhausen since the dawn of time. They also host other spammers, run DNS servers for spammers, host in Australia with Westbury/Basten, host websites on dial-up accounts. You name it, they've done it.

In 2002 the Washington state attorney general went after the Meltzers for violations of the state law, and in 2003 the SEC labeled him a "professional Internet spammer" and filed a complaint "accusing Meltzer of sending millions of unsolicited e-mail messages as part of a fraudulent scheme to promote at least a dozen penny stocks."

SPAMMER: Sam Meltzer
aka: Aaron Jackson & Tracy Spencer & Marilyn Monroe & Charles Burns &
Jeremie Calvin & Louis Cyphire & Charles Parker & Kevin Smith &
Ren Hoek
His brother: Adam Meltzer (lives with him in MN, also a spammer)
Also known as "the Eventemp death threat spammer"
renhoek@citilink.com (11/97) renhoek@SKYPOINT.COM (11/97)
renhoek@bigfoot.com (5/97) hindustries@sprintmail.com (10/98)
jeremie@MN.USWEST.NET (2/98) hoekind@MAILCITY.COM (2/99)
renhoek@IBM.NET (3/99)

1-651-224-2484 (home number) / 1-651-659-0304
1-612-894-5781 / 1-612-646-8174
1-612-659-0304 / 1-651-292-8078

Cyber-Stock, Smart-Stocks, Super-Stock, Super-Stocks,
Interstock, Stock Market 2002, Stock Web 1001, Stock Web Inc
Stock Market 1999 (STOCKMARKET15-DOM)
Stock Market 2002 (STOCKMARKET14-DOM)
Stock Vest (STOCK-VEST2-DOM)
Interstock Inc. (STOCK-INVESTIGATOR-DOM)
Interstock Inc. (FINANCIALBULL-DOM)
P.O. Box 130544, St Paul, MN 55113
P.O. Box 16082, St Paul, MN 55116
P.O. Box 16213 Elway Station
1333/1370 Carling Drive, St. Paul, MN 55108

Free Vacations 4 You (FREEVACATIONS4YOU-DOM)
P.O. Box 16213, St Paul, MN 55116

Calvin Enterprises, Inc.
3200 Brookview Dr., Burnsville, MN 55337

Best Stock & Best Stocks & Inteliwebb
4325 34th Street, Des Moines, IA 50310
3231 39th Street, Des Moines, IA 50310
1037 Street Suit H, Des Moines, IA 50312

Stock-2000 (STOCK-2-DOM)
3237 Stall Ave, Roseville, MN 55113

Stock Trader 2001 (STOCKTRADER5-DOM)
Stock Trader 1999 (STOCKTRADER7-DOM)
P.O. Box 12201321
Dallas, TX 95003

Stock 1999 (STOCK-3-DOM), Direct Form (DIRECTFORM-DOM),
Lanpfirm Enterprises (LANPFIRM-DOM), StockPromo (STOCKPROMO-DOM),
WebStocks1999.com (WEBSTOCKS6-DOM), lagniappe (STOCKSPIKE-DOM)
6860 Gulfport Blvd. So. # 284, St. Petersburg, FL 33707

Oscar Patterson (JOP10) (JOP12) (OP560) (OP169) (Spamming buddy in FL)
Lagniappe Management Inc. & Zandria Entertainment Networks Inc.
146 Second Street North, Suite 310, St. Petersburg,, FL 33701
sales@z-land.com & 2bfree@GTE.NET & zandria1@GTE.NET &
lagniappe58@HOTBOT.COM & lagniappe58@HOTMAIL.COM
DIAMONDSHOW.COM / CYBERJETSTREAM.COM / Z-LAND.COM / SUPPLYTEL.COM
727-388 0575 / Fax- 727-388 0577
727-338-0757 / 813-894-0386 (dead) (FAX) 727-823-8961

Magtrav, Inc. (TIMBERDNS-DOM)
13350 West Colonial Drive STE 350
Wintergarden, FL 34787 US
1-407-654-7700

Winner Stocks (WINNER-STOCKS-DOM)
2623 Grand Ave, Los Angeles, CA 90215
Stewart, Martin (SM1350-ORG)
1-310-580-4117

Cyber Webbb (CYBER-WEBBB-DOM)
P.O. Box 49323
Max, ND 58710

DuncanDns (DUNCANDNS-DOM)
Stock Market 2020 (STOCKMARKET20-DOM)
6709 King Freeway
Jackson, MS 83092 US

Stock Market 2001 (STOCKMARKET13-DOM)
2623 Grand Ave
Los Angeles, CA 90215 US

Stock Research 2000 (STOCKRESEARCH5-DOM)
P.O. Box 30100042
Houston, TX 95921 US

Growth Stocks 2000 (GROWTHSTOCKS5-DOM)
P.O. Box 302012-A
Miami, FL 39012 US

Joan Adams (THEROCKDNS-DOM)
4563 south ave
harrisburg, IN 83245 US
Host, Master (MHE225) bigjoe@FREEWEBCITY.COM
Therockdns.com
3425 suunyvale
detroit , MI 93829

Mega Free Sites (MEGAFREESITES-DOM)
3029 West 11th #3029
New York, NY 10021 US
Domain Name: MEGAFREESITES.COM
Admin, Webmaster (WAM339) admin@MEGAFREESITES.COM
212 100 3220
Record last updated on 09-Sep-2000.
Record created on 09-Sep-2000.

SANDS, JOHN (DNSQUITO-DOM)
3029 West 11th #3029
NEW YORK, NY 10021 US
Domain Name: DNSQUITO.COM
SANDS, JOHN (JXS1137) dnsquito@hotmail.com
212 100 3220 (FAX) 123 123 1234
Record last updated on 09-Sep-2000.
Record created on 07-Sep-2000.

SPAM PARTNER: Web Marketing Network (STOCK-SIGHTINGS-DOM)
15307 Amberly Dr., suite 154, Tampa, FL 33647 US
DotComCorp, LLC
1813 Kalurna Ct, Orlando, FL 32806 US
Robert Grant (MAKEYOUR-DOM)
1103 Sea Board Ave NW, Atlanta, GA 30318, US
Robert Grant (SR852-ORG) hostmaster@MAKEYOUR.COM
407.481.2621 Fax- - 404.367.9245
C,J (CJ1215-ORG) masterpromo@DESKMAIL.COM
813.972.8115

SPAM PARTNER: MicroCapMarkets.com (MICROCAPMARKETS-DOM)
251 Saulteaux Crescent
WINNIPEG, MB R3J 3C7 CA
Domain Name: MICROCAPMARKETS.COM
Administrator, System (SAZ533) admin@MICROCAPMARKETS.COM
204 885 5555
Record last updated on 30-Oct-2000.
Record created on 11-Oct-2000.
Domain servers in listed order:
NS1.CANADAWEBHOUSE.COM 64.59.135.16
NS2.CANADAWEBHOUSE.COM 64.59.135.17

MORE INFO: mindspring.com
sec.gov
Shill for Francis Tribble & Joseph Tribble, son/father owners of
JT's Restaurants, found guilty in SEC fraud probe.
dejanews.com[ST_rn=qs]/getdoc.xp?AN=422715004 [expired]
people.delphi.com

WEBSITES: cybersitebroker.com (on one.net.au network)
canadawebhouse.com (on mbnet.mb.ca)
microcapmarkets.com (on mbnet.mb.ca)
wisestocks2000.com (on Optus.au network)
megafreesites.com (on Optus.au network)
dnsquito.com (on Optus.au network)
stockprofile2000.com (on Optus.au network)
stockprofile2000.net (on Optus.au network)
stock-researcher.com (on Optus.au network)
stockalert2000.com (on Telstra network)
webpages2001.com (on Telstra network)
stock-researcher.com (on Telstra network)
stockmarketletter.com (on Telstra network)
marketprofile2000.com (on Telstra network)
mastdns.com (on Telstra network)
stockwatcher2000.com (on Telstra network)
growthstocks2000.com (on Telstra network)
stockresearch2000.com (on Telstra network)
wisestocks2000.com (on Telstra network)
webpages2001.com (on Telstra network)
stock-vest.com (on Telstra network)
therockdns.com (on Telstra network)
financialbull.com (up 3/29/2000 - Hufnal)
usnameservers.net (on spam house: weblizard.net)
203.47.4.193 (on Telstra network)
freevacations4you.com (dead)
cyberhost2001.com (on spam house: web-housing.net)
(run by spammer: Jerry Mayvill)
webhost2001.com
216.33.20.4
stock-sightings.com (shut down)
stockmarket2020.com (shut down)
stockmarket5000.com (shut down)
duncandns.com (shut down)
stockmarket1999.com (? mcs.com)
stockmarket2001.com (? gate.net)
stockmarket2002.com (? transcomm.net - spam host)
stocktrader2001.com (?)
stocktrader1999.com (?)
stock-2001.com (up on Digex 5/5)
stockweb-2001.com (up on Digex 5/5)
stocks-1999.com (up on Digex 5/5)
stockweb-1999.com (shut down 5/9)
stockwebinc.com (shut down 4/25)
stockwatch2001.com (shut down 4/25)
internetstocks2001.com (shut down 4/25)
stockwebcorp.com (?)
stockwebsite.com (? webgate2000.com - spam host)
stockweb1001.com (?)
stockweb1000.com (?)
stockspike.com (?)
57pickup.com (?)
stocksfor99.com (? - Hufnal)
>> up! financialbull.com (1998 - Hufnal)
(on mbnet.mb.ca)
>> up! stock-investigator.com (up 4/20 - Hufnal)
(down 5/5)
(up 3/23/2000 - Hufnal)
(on Global Crossing 01/01 - Spammer Jon Harris)
removemenow.org (shut down 4/9)
mightymoe.com (shut down 4/9)
stock-market1999.com (shut down 4/9)
stock-market2000.com (shut down 4/9)
stock-market2001.com (shut down 4/9)
stockmarket2002.com (?)
stockweb1999.com (shut down 4/8)
stockweb2000.com (shut down 4/8)
stockweb2001.com (shut down 4/8)
(back up on igs.net 4/9)
(shut down 4/11)
fleurette.net (shut down 4/8)
(back up on igs.net 4/9)
(shut down 4/11)
stockpromo.com (?)
webstocks1999.com (?)
webstocks2000.com (?)
webstocks2001.com (shut down 4/25)
winnerstockpicks.com (?)
cyber-webbb.com (2/18 ?)
cyber-hostmaster.com (dead)
directform.com (shut down 2/12)
stock99.com (re-registered)
stock-1999.com (shut down 2/12)
winner-stocks.com (shut down 2/5)
cyber-webb.com (shut down 2/5)
best-stock.com (shut down 1/21)
best-stocks.com (down)
stock-2000.com (shut down 1/21)
inteliwebb.com (shut down 1/21)
growth-stocks.net (shut down 1/10)
real-stocks.com (shut down 12/29)
real-stocks.net (shut down 12/29)
real-stock.com (shut down)
hot-stock.com (down)
stock-pick.net (shut down)
stock-pick.com (shut down)
doctor-stock.com (shut down)
jt-restaurants.com (shut down)
super-stock.net (shut down 10/26)
super-stocks.com (shut down 10/23)
smart-stocks.com (shut down 10/20)
(back up on NETCASTING.NET 10/22)
(shut down 10/23)
>> up! cyber-stock.net (shut down 9/8/99)
(back up on GOOD.NET 10/2/99 down 10/20/99)
(back up on VERIO.NET 10/21/99 down 10/22/99)
(back up on GOOD.NET 10/23/99 - Spammer Hufnal)
(on Global Crossing 01/01 - Spammer Jon Harris)
hoek-industries.com (shut down 10/23)
cyber-market.net (shut down) "AJ Indistries"
cyber-media.net (shut down) "Hoek Industries"
jtsr-stock.com (shut down)
hot-stocks.com (shut down 8/1)
(someone else now registered the domain.)
citilink.com (down)
pc-xxx.com (down)
live-xxx.net (down)
cyber-pages.net (down)
cyber-spot.net (down)
etmp.com (down)
advantage-life.com (down)
(someone else now registered the domain.)
net-vest.com (down)
cyber-website.com (down)
calvinenterprises.com (down)
geocities.com (dead)

Related URLs:
Eventemp saga
SEC investigation
SEC suspension of spammed stock
Sample of the Eventemp spam

PARTNERS IN SPAM: Dean Westbury - Phil Basten
PARTNERS IN SPAM: Peter Schroebel - SMS/Fullport



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The above consists of information in the public domain. The Spamhaus Project makes every effort to avoid errors in submissions to the database, and will correct any errors, but accepts no responsibility or liability for any errors, or liability for any loss or damage, consequential or otherwise, incurred in reliance on the material in these pages. The information on this site is for information purposes only and is not intended as legal advice of any kind.

The URL to this record is: spamhaus.org



To: RockyBalboa who wrote (11115)2/19/2003 11:05:21 PM
From: StockDung  Respond to of 19428
 
Step One—Nominee Service

The initial list of officers for the corproation must be filed with the Secretary of State by the first day of the month following the month of incorporation. Assuming that privacy is the goal, you will probably want to use nominee service, whereby the nominee is listed as all of the corporation’s officers and directors.  (In Nevada, one person may be all of a corporation’s officers and its director.) This decision, as with all decisions made by you as “caretaker” of the corporation, should be documented with a corporate resolution, signed by yourself as the corporation’s REAL director.

With the filing of the initial list of officers using a nominee to represent the corporation on the only NRS-mandated public record, you now have control of the corporation but nobody can discern that fact based upon any outside observation.    So far, so good.

Click here or on the navigational button above to proceed to Step Two.

Step Two—Appointment of Officers

The next step might be to establish who the REAL corporate officers are. Acting as Director, you may appoint anyone you wish to various positions—including yourself, since Nevada allows one person to occupy all positions.  You could also appoint yourself to the position of Vice President, as long as the Bylaws empower the Vice President to act in the absence of the President.

Taking these appointments a step further:  As long as the Bylaws authorize such officers (and if they don’t you might want to adopt Bylaws that do), you could appoint your resident agent as, say, Assistant Secretary.  This would allow the resident agent to sign the annual list of officers, attest to the corporate Bylaws or even to certify minutes of meetings, for instance. You could appoint someone to act as Assistant Treasurer, allowing them to have signing authority over the corporation’s bank account.  Some resident agents offer to handle such things for various fees, generally relating to perceptions of potential liability.  If you would find such services valuable in implementing privacy—ask.  Remember, none of these officers need to be listed with the Secretary of State!

At this point, you now have formalized control over the corporation WITHIN its corporate records but nobody on the OUTSIDE has any way of knowing how the corporation is really structured.All they can know, until you tell them differently, is whatever is a matter of public record.  And the public record shows only the name and signature of the NOMINEE.

Step Three—The “Tricky” Part—Ownership

Now, who is going to OWN the corporation—to whom will stock be issued? The best answer to this question depends on a number of factors but note that no matter what decision is made at this point, the records of stock ownership are completely internal to the corporation and unavailable to any casually-inquiring non-stockholder. In really serious attempts to penetrate the corporation’s privacy, by the time a Court Order would compel production of the corporation’s records you should be able to have everything in order, “according to Hoyle”.

If the corporation will be subject to IRS designations such as “Personal Service Corporation”, “Personal Holding Company” or “controlled group” status—then it might be wise to issue stock to at least 6 separate shareholders, because the definition of each of those applies to situations where there are 5 or fewer shareholders.

These stockholders do not even need to be named within the stock ledger—you could just make the certificates out to “bearer”!  And where the stock ledger indicates the “consideration” for which the shares were issued (typically stated as “amount paid thereon”), you might put, “for services rendered”. You might recall that Nevada’s corporate statutes allow for stock to be issued in exchanged for services AND that the Board of Directors may determine what value is ascribed to such services.

Since control of the corporation rests ultimately, by law, with the corporation’s stockholders, you might want to make out the certificates for the nominal amount of 100 shares each. At this point, if the corporation has the typical 25,000 shares authorized (specified in the Articles of Incorporation), you have issued just 2.4% of the authorized stock but it represents “potentially” 100% of the corporation’s ownership. Any actual or prospective “bearer” of such stock might enter into a side agreement with you, allowing you (or the corporation) the right to repurchase the stock for a nominal fee at any time, along with an understanding that you will have an irrevocable proxy to vote the stock.

Let’s see what would happen if the side agreements failed to do their job, if they somehow got “lost and forgotten”:  Any formal attempt to take over the corporation on the part of the stockholders would have to be done at a stockholders’ meeting, of which the corporation itself must be notified, along with the stated purpose of the meeting.  (This is a standard provision in a corporation’s Bylaws.  If it is not in your Bylaws—put it there. If you don’t know how to accomplish this properly, please contact us.)

Assuming that your Articles of Incorporation specify the standard amount of stock, they authorize the issuance of 25,000 shares. With 25,000 authorized and 600 shares issued, any such maneuver by your new-found enemies could be forestalled by the issuance of 601 shares to someone more “friendly”! Or, better still, issue all of the remaining shares—diluting the outstanding shares substantially—leaving the former-friends-turned-hostile with exactly 2.4% interest in the company. And if that’s too much for your liking?

The Board of Directors (YOU) may amend the Articles of Incorporation and increase the number of authorized shares to, say, one million—leaving the traitors with six-one hundredths of 1% of the value of the corporation; a veritable “mouthful of dirt”.  (Again, if you need help with amending the corporation’s Articles, please contact us.)

Please bear in mind that there is no liability whatsoever attached to ownership of stock!  So it should be easy to find some friends who might be willing to do this for you—especially if you would do the same for them.  On the other hand, if you find a lack of friends willing to participate, you could always ask us about our “nominee stockholding” arrangement.  CORPORATIONS CAN OWN STOCK, TOO, AND WE JUST HAPPEN TO BE ASSOCIATED WITH HUNDREDS OF CORPORATIONS, MANY OF WHICH MIGHT SHARE YOUR CONCERNS ABOUT AND INTEREST IN MAINTAINING PRIVACY.

Step Four—The Really Tricky Part—Control Without Ownership

Looking, as we have been, from the INSIDE of things, is there any doubt who is in CONTROL of the corporation? From the OUTSIDE, of course, it’s a completely different matter. All that anyone on the outside can see is whatever is a matter of public record—the list of officers filed with the Secretary of State, which shows only a nominee. Anyone on the outside cannot know anything at all about ownership unless you tell them.

“But,” it might be argued, “the corporation has to FUNCTION! What happens when you go to open a bank account or apply for a business license, or do any number of other things that require the signature of a corporate officer or disclosure of the corporation’s principals?” Yes, this can get a little tricky in some cases. Let’s look at two of the most awkward situations and see if there are some solutions to the perceived problems.

Business Licensing

The application for a business license in Las Vegas entails filling out the form, “Nevada Business Registration” as well as the “City of Las Vegas Supplement”. Section 10 of the Nevada Business Registration asks for the “Names of owner(s), Partners, Corporate Officers, Etc.” and provides spaces for name, title, percent owned, residence address, residence phone, SS# and date of birth. “If Individual Ownership,” the form declares, “list only one Owner.” Hmmm—sticky wicket!  Or so it seems, on the face of things.

What happens if you don’t have a business license? Do you really need a business license? What might ever trigger an inspection of your business to determine if it is licensed? How many of the over 300,000 corporations registered in the State of Nevada have or do not have business licenses?  Why is there such a thing as business licensing?  Let’s obtain the answer to the last question, directly from the City of Las Vegas web-site regarding licensing:

“Why does the City license businesses? Businesses are licensed to insure that their location is properly zoned for the activity to be conducted, that the building the business will be operating in meets fire safety code standards, that all state and local codes are adhered to insuring the safety and well-being of our citizens, and that privilege businesses are properly regulated.”

If the activity of the business requires a physical presence in the form of office space not otherwise licensed (say, as in the case of a “virtual office”), then issues of zoning, fire safety and the safety of Nevada’s citizens are involved.  Otherwise, how is there ever going to be any connection to these stated reasons for requiring licensing?  (This is very reminiscent of NRS 78.105, which requires that a corporation maintain certain records at its registered office—for inspection by the stockholders.  If inspection by the stockholders is not an issue—why maintain such records?)

Let’s say that you are occupying physical space in the conduct of your business and you DO require a business license.  What then?  Remember that section 10 of the Nevada Business Registration form adds, “If Individual Ownership, list only one Owner.”  What if the owner of ABC happened to be a corporation named XYZ?  It seems it would be entirely possible to submit that ABC’s individual owner is XYZ. XYZ could provide its Employer Identification Number in the space where “SSN” would otherwise be required.

Keep in mind that ownership of a corporation can be a very transitory thing. It might be one thing at the moment the Nevada Business Registration form is signed and it might be something else altogether just a few hours later.

As for signing the application, perhaps a minor officer of the corporation, a vice president or an assistant secretary could do that. Certainly, one would hardly expect the CEOs of IBM or Exxon to be involved with such an application on behalf of their corporations!

All that is necessary to maintain corporate privacy in most cases is a little careful THOUGHT. Think it through and you will find your answers. And if you need a little help, give us a call and maybe we can find a solution for your particular situation by thinking it through together.

Banking

Many people seem to think that setting up a corporate bank account eliminates the possibility of maintaining corporate privacy. This is not true.  Signing authority over a corporation’s bank account does not constitute either ownership or control of the corporation. It is true that the authorized signer(s) are linked to the corporation—but linked in what way?

Most banks require a corporate resolution authorizing the signer to open and maintain the bank account. The signer, however, is not required to be an owner or Director. In fact, many banks in Nevada will accept a corporate resolution “signed” (often with a facsimile signature) by a known nominee, leaving the real Director(s) out of the picture altogether.

Thus, all the banking resolution reveals is the identity of the authorized signer, who may be a “secondary” officer of the corporation—a vice president or an assistant treasurer.  This person could be the corporate bookkeeper—or just someone authorized to sign checks.  From the corporation’s perspective, this party must be trustworthy but need not know anything much about the corporation’s activities.  They might sign so many checks that they use a signature stamp to make quick work of it.

For corporations, there is absolutely nothing unusual about the use of a facsimile of a signature on company checks. Whether electronically embedded in the laser printing of checks or affixed with a rubber stamp, the bank does not generally question those signatures!  If you do not know someone who would allow you to stamp their signature on the company’s checks like this, contact us and we can discuss nominee check signing, for a nominal fee.

Many banks offer corporate “debit” cards, which are in both appearance and day-to-day usage, very similar to credit cards.  Such a card can be used to book airline hotel reservations, or to obtain cash from ATMs. The use of such a card automatically debits the corporate checking account, so there are no credit-card-type fees.  Where arrangements have been made for nominee check signing, it may be possible to have such a corporate debit card issued in the name of the nominee signer—but usable in many ways by the corporation’s other officers.  Please understand that such a card is probably NOT usable for direct, face-to-face payments at retail stores, where identification for the individual named on the card will often be demanded.

Other Situations

In most cases, the signature of a corporate vice president will prove sufficient to satisfy the curiosity of the outside world.  A corporation may, of course, have any number of vice presidents, whose term of office might last for anywhere from a few hours to indefinitely. If you need help thinking through the specifics of a troublesome situation, please contact us.

budgetcorporaterenewals.com