Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Alighieri who wrote (161687)	2/20/2003 7:43:09 AM
From: brian1501	Respond to of 1575758

So you think the UN, country and the world would have supported Clinton then when it is revolting against Bush now, despite sept 11? Shoot, they love him so much they may just have done that. The point is the right thing to do is the right thing to do, and he didn't do it because of polls etc. That is why he was a weak president. He was not a "leader" at all...only a follower. Brian

To: Alighieri who wrote (161687)	2/20/2003 9:24:11 AM
From: i-node	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1575758

So you think the UN, country and the world would have supported Clinton then when it is revolting against Bush now, despite sept 11? Are you kidding? Hell, Clinton went to war with Kosovo, where neither the level of human rights violations nor the national security threat compared with that presented by Iraq. This "revolt" is totally politically motivated. That said, even a Republican could have more easily gone to war against Iraq 5 years ago when Iraq first began to refuse access to inspectors. But after it was let go for five years, complacency set in.