Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: hmaly who wrote (161697)	2/20/2003 1:46:43 PM
From: tejek	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1575426

Ted RE..Disarm him and keep the sanctions on him. And just who should keep the sanctions on, and how? After all, it was the sanctions against Iraq, and the US troops in SA that OBL gives as the main reasons for his jihad. Why don't Germany and France, who have been so eager to continue sanctions and delay, offer to patrol the no fly zone themselves, and station their troops in the middle east, to protect SA and Kuwait, so that they are the target of all of the new Bin Ladens. Then I would bet their zeal for delay and letting Saddam defy resolutions would change. I thought France did have military in Iraq and I know Germany has them in Afghanistan. ted