Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: goldworldnet who wrote (361779)	2/20/2003 3:57:22 PM
From: George Coyne	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

Here's a left wing site and I hate to admit it, but they have a point, because there isn't enough stuff for everybody to live the way we do, no matter how many schools you build. WADR, gold, You have made a linear extrapolation of some sort. In reality, the world economy if allowed, will evolve in wondrous and non-linear ways. The size of the pie is NOT fixed!

To: goldworldnet who wrote (361779)	2/21/2003 2:17:17 AM
From: DuckTapeSunroof	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

The problem, I think, is that once a nation 'goes nuclear' it is unlikely to go back. Only South Africa renounced it's nuclear weapons after building them (and Brazil... a year or two before testing them). Circumstances were particular in both cases... Democracy had swept out the old autocratic rulers, and their were large economic benefits attached to renouncing their nukes. Perhaps we can learn from those examples: 1) Democratic governments - generally - are more peaceful... so they should always be preferred over even the most 'compliant' of 'friendly dictators'. Here, our long-term national interest of promoting Democracies should ALWAYS trump our occasional tendency to back authoritarian rulers who 'play ball' (Saudi Arabia, anyone? Pakistan? Indonesia? Egypt? Former Soviet Republics?) 2) Offering a big financial benefit for renouncing nukes, or the aiding of proliferation (Russia, Germany, Pakistan)... and exacting a big financial hit (embargoes, trade sanctions, denial of loans and grants, seizing the leader's bank accounts and property) for those who pursue nuclear ambitions... eventually seems to work also. We need to get all the big power behind these type of actions.