SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: paul_philp who wrote (76063)2/20/2003 3:51:40 PM
From: RealMuLan  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
It is true that I assume I am right, but I am ok with other view point. I am ok with all kinds of disagreement. And that is exactly why I think there is NO point for further argument. The world is large enough to let all of us live together peacefully.

BTW, I said this here before, and I say it again, if those of you really interested in Tibetan issue, go to Tibet have a visit, talk to some local Tibetans, especially people in their 60s, who still have some old memories. Tibetans who are living in the West now, including in the US, are overwhelmingly slave/serf owners in 1950s. So what do you expect them to say? They did lose their fortune after all.

I think I have said enough on this. No further comment on any returned post on this issue.



To: paul_philp who wrote (76063)2/20/2003 4:00:16 PM
From: JohnM  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
Paul,

This, once again, reference from you about paradigm change and Kuhn's 60s work, reminds me of the old canard about economists who predicted 10 of the last 2 recessions. Your predictions of paradigm change are along the same lines. However, should you choose to keep it up, I will, at least, know that harmony still reins in the universe.