SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : DON'T START THE WAR -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: ajax99 who wrote (11060)2/20/2003 4:06:43 PM
From: Tom_H_68  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 25898
 
No, they won't. I used them all the time in my .50cal sniper rifle. They are perfectly safe to handle. You think that they get loaded onto aircraft by machines?

What Army were you in?

I see you STILL offer me no answers to my questions and no proof of your position.

tom



To: ajax99 who wrote (11060)2/20/2003 4:07:57 PM
From: Tom_H_68  Respond to of 25898
 
Nice reputable source you have there - loser.

I'm still waiting my proof.



To: ajax99 who wrote (11060)2/20/2003 4:20:02 PM
From: Tom_H_68  Respond to of 25898
 
I'm Waiting Ajax...

Message 18607067



To: ajax99 who wrote (11060)2/20/2003 4:27:42 PM
From: AK2004  Respond to of 25898
 
a
try this
gulflink.osd.mil
it is very dangerous if you get hit by DU shell and it get inside of your body - surprising, is not it
Russian made cars that are used in Iraq contain far more hazardous materials than DU



To: ajax99 who wrote (11060)2/20/2003 4:48:49 PM
From: Tom_H_68  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 25898
 
I will take your unwillingness to respond to my questions and lack of supporting evidence as proof that have absolutely no idea what you are talking about.

I will throw one more question out there -

How does someone who served in the U.S.Army, with the largest tank fleet in the world, not know what depleted uranium is used for?

tom