Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: SeaViewer who wrote (223006)	2/20/2003 7:28:38 PM
From: patron_anejo_por_favor	Respond to of 436258

<<What do you think about the proposal of changing short-selling rule? If there is a rule change, there is a lot of trouble for the shorts.>> Serves 'em right, we all KNOW they're nothing but a bunch of financial terrorists, right?<VBG> Seriously, all that could be expected would be an initial pop up, then the same downward action caused by long liquidation. Also a LOT more volatility, since there won't be any short covering to absorb the volume. I suspect poots would become VERY popular (especially deep in the money) and call-selling would increase. Net/net...no difference at all, just a lateral move in the glide path...

To: SeaViewer who wrote (223006)	2/20/2003 7:28:46 PM
From: Box-By-The-Riviera™	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 436258

got ill liquid market? <g> those fuckerz are gonna get hit in the gonads if they do that. sounds just like that malaysian dude... they've ruined our currency. ROFL!