SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : DON'T START THE WAR -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: TigerPaw who wrote (11179)2/20/2003 11:16:05 PM
From: Brumar89  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 25898
 
Iraq's policies have been much better in the last 12 years than they were in the 12 before.

Well, they've been hampered by UN economic sanctions and the no-fly zones for the past 12 years. But the sanctions aren't going to be maintained forever. Saddam has been attempting to bribe several UN Security Council member nations - France, Russia, and China - into ending sanctions.

If this war were really about policies the war would be against one of many other more deserving targets.

France?

The number one reason for attacking Iraq seems to be that it is weak, and not that it is a threat. After that it is natural resources

Canada is weak and rich in natural resources. And its so close. Wonder why we aren't attacking them?



To: TigerPaw who wrote (11179)2/20/2003 11:55:29 PM
From: Lazarus_Long  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 25898
 
A lot of you peaceniks have been wondering what's going on here. You suspect we and the President are lying.

You're right. The cover story being put out is for international consumption. We'll tell you loyal Americans who never even think of treason the truth.

We're going to off Saddam. And any members of his family likely to try to succeed him.

Now all of you weasels who disapprove of this, raise your tails.