Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : DON'T START THE WAR -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bald Eagle who wrote (11337)	2/21/2003 9:51:24 AM
From: 49thMIMOMander	Respond to of 25898

Strange that so many think a civil war, with a little revenge, cleansing, fights over oil, between old and especially the new, opportunistic groups of Irak would lead to exactly the opposite. No wonder that the only signs of Al Qaeda in Irak is in the northern US-UK unilateral, not-UN-supported no-fly zone. That is, fertile ground and perfect opportunities for terrorism, with different groups from the whole region plus some more distant ones involved. And for those WMDs, are you talking nuclear bombs, or biological ones, difficult to produce or very simple to produce?? Or stuff which any basic chemical labratory, factory can produce?? On the other hand, if you would have written < After US has taken over Iraq, this will prevent Al Qaeda ..> the rest might be kind of probable, except that it would be a really good situation for any anti-american terrorist group to get more supporters and do some on-site practicing. Now, if those "Saddam's WMDs" would be so easy to get rid of then, by finding out where they are, how come it is so difficult now, by the inspectors, when somebody claims "they know they are there" but won't tell?? Btw, no wonder Superman was/is so popular in USA, he would truely be needed in the willing coalition, just as to sort out US domestic crime, use his magic alien forces to cath the bad guys.