SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : The Boxing Ring Revived -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Neocon who wrote (4712)2/21/2003 4:10:58 PM
From: The Philosopher  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 7720
 
No, I'm not saying that the slippery slope is valid.

I think it's too often a convenient but inaccurate way for people to oppose rational attempts to address problems.

The pendulum was Karen's image, which is why I used it.

But if I had to come up with my own, I think I would be more apt to say it's like driving a car with very sloppy steering. You start to steer left and it doesn't respond right away so you turn the wheel harder and then it turns but now it's going too far left and so you turn it back right and but it's slow to correct and you don't want to wait so you turn harder and then it goes right but too far, and so and so on. Self-correcting motion which takes a while to settle down to a straight line, then you're fine for awhile, but then the road turns because something has changed in society and you have the same problem all over again until you get it right.



To: Neocon who wrote (4712)2/21/2003 4:49:43 PM
From: Lane3  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 7720
 
An example of a slippery slope that corrected during my lifetime is the arms race.

Another is the move to godlessness that was cranking up to full steam when I was coming of age.

Another is the despoiling of environment. At least the pace of that has slowed down.

And then there's affirmative action, welfare,...