SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: tejek who wrote (161900)2/22/2003 5:52:10 PM
From: i-node  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1579681
 
..............,give my some of lying or distortions.

Hmmmmm...........I thought Iraq was the primary threat when it came to nukes?


THIS is your example? Ha.

I think it is obvious the administration believes NK represents the "primary threat", Iraq the second, and Iran tertiary. But there is little doubt they're concerned about the Paks, India, and others as well.

It is awfully simple minded to conclude that because we're dealing with Iraq first the administration believes it to be the "greatest" threat. There are numerous other factors that are involved in this determination.

Complicated, huh?



To: tejek who wrote (161900)2/23/2003 12:09:33 AM
From: d[-_-]b  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1579681
 
tejek,

re:Hmmmmm...........I thought Iraq was the primary threat when it came to nukes?


They are....but why do you suppose Iran wants them?

Could it be to keep up and counter the threat Iraq poses to them if they get nukes. Do you think anyone in the world will come to Irans aid if Saddam attacks them again?

I wonder how much we're going to have to pay to Iran to stop their program, think they need a near new reactor? We could give them the one in NK.