Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: J_F_Shepard who wrote (362562)	2/22/2003 9:42:25 PM
From: goldworldnet	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

*Sorry I expressed sympathy for you* I don't see why you would feel that way. This was my post. It takes a lot of nerve to walk into a store and forge someone else's name. It would be expected that this was a poor person and the items selected (I can't say purchased) would indicate this. However, I've know many poor honest God fearing people that would give you the shirt off their back. I've also know many poor people that are the scum of the earth. Financial means is a poor indicator of people's ethical standards. Education is also a poor indicator of people's ethical standards. I am a strong Republican, but in the aftermath of the stock market bubble, I am sorry that more richer schiesters have not treated as the scum that they are. No political party has a monopoly on decency, but I do believe firmly that Democrats are much more willing to scrape the bottom of the barrel. You didn't like the last part of my post. But, it is the Democratic party that wants current convicts in the penitentiary system to vote. Are these really the people you think should be the deciding factor? I acknowledged that there good decent poor people and also that there are rich people who are despicable and should be prosecuted as such. Quite frankly, there are some people whose help I do not want. It appears that you cannot say the same and I feel sorry for you. * * *