To: Bill Harmond who wrote (153501 ) 2/23/2003 9:10:48 AM From: craig crawford Respond to of 164684 as long as y'all are bickering about the usefulness of generals... happy birthday mr george washington! not only a fine president, but a fine general as well. maybe president bush should take a lesson from the first american general president, and for that matter our last general to become president, dwight david eisenhower. eisenhower was the last president to stand up to israel, and also the last president to do anything about the immigration problem. he's the only decent president we have had in the last 50 years. Washington's Farewell Address 1796 yale.edu So likewise, a passionate attachment of one nation for another [the U.S. for israel] produces a variety of evils. Sympathy for the favorite nation [israel] , facilitating the illusion of an imaginary common interest in cases where no real common interest exists, and infusing into one the enmities of the other, betrays the former [the U.S.] into a participation in the quarrels and wars of the latter [israel] without adequate inducement or justification. It leads also to concessions to the favorite nation [israel] of privileges [billions in direct and military aid every year] denied to others [arabs] which is apt doubly to injure the nation making the concessions [the U.S.] ; by unnecessarily parting with what ought to have been retained [U.S. taxpayer money] , and by exciting jealousy, ill-will, and a disposition to retaliate, in the parties from whom equal privileges are withheld. [arabs] And it gives to ambitious, corrupted, or deluded citizens [zionist christians and jews] , (who devote themselves to the favorite nation) [israel] facility to betray or sacrifice the interests of their own country, without odium, sometimes even with popularity; gilding, with the appearances of a virtuous sense of obligation, a commendable deference for public opinion, or a laudable zeal for public good, the base or foolish compliances of ambition, corruption, or infatuation. .......................................................................................................................... The great rule of conduct for us in regard to foreign nations is in extending our commercial relations, to have with them as little political connection as possible. [this would include israel] So far as we have already formed engagements, let them be fulfilled with perfect good faith. Here let us stop. Europe has a set of primary interests which to us have none; or a very remote relation. Hence she must be engaged in frequent controversies, the causes of which are essentially foreign to our concerns. Hence, therefore, it must be unwise in us to implicate ourselves by artificial ties in the ordinary vicissitudes of her politics, or the ordinary combinations and collisions of her friendships or enmities. Our detached and distant situation invites and enables us to pursue a different course. If we remain one people under an efficient government. the period is not far off when we may defy material injury from external annoyance; when we may take such an attitude as will cause the neutrality we may at any time resolve upon to be scrupulously respected; when belligerent nations, under the impossibility of making acquisitions upon us, will not lightly hazard the giving us provocation; when we may choose peace or war, as our interest, guided by justice, shall counsel. Why forego the advantages of so peculiar a situation? Why quit our own to stand upon foreign ground? Why, by interweaving our destiny with that of any part of Europe, entangle our peace and prosperity in the toils of European ambition, rivalship, interest, humor or caprice? It is our true policy to steer clear of permanent alliances with any portion of the foreign world; so far, I mean, as we are now at liberty to do it; for let me not be understood as capable of patronizing infidelity to existing engagements. I hold the maxim no less applicable to public than to private affairs, that honesty is always the best policy. I repeat it, therefore, let those engagements be observed in their genuine sense. But, in my opinion, it is unnecessary and would be unwise to extend them.