Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: hmaly who wrote (161907)	2/23/2003 2:21:03 PM
From: tejek	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1583507

Ted Re..There will be no more Iraqis involved and it is expected that the US will pocket all the money it makes selling the oil in the global markets. And just what proof do you have that GW has the power to take over Iraqi oil fields even if he wanted to I never said he would......that's the theory of some; not what was discussed in the article presented by Tim. ted

To: hmaly who wrote (161907)	2/23/2003 2:23:32 PM
From: tejek	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1583507

This author appears to be intentionally misunderstanding the accusation leveled against the Bushies That accusation is so incredible that it makes no sense, so the author interprets the accusation, in a way that would be possible. There is no legal way GW could possibly do what you are accusing him of trying to do, so why are you accusing him of that. Even the biggest crook on record, your buddy Bill couldn't get away with that. Delusional? I thought you were the one that said anything is possible in war. If you didn't, you should of. Having said that, like I said before, I don't think Bush will try that........it would be very foolish with the eyes of the world watching. ted