Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: LindyBill who wrote (76729)	2/23/2003 11:36:46 AM
From: JohnM	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

Bill, please slow this down. Are you now accusing Win of anti-semitism because he sees Wolfowitz as the beating heart of the neocons in the Bush administration? Surely not. You will certainly have to do the same with me, then. And with a great many Jewish critics of Wolfowitz' policy arguments as well. As for "Perle and company", I can easily offer that remark. It's a standin for political neoconservatives. Let's be very cautious about labeling folk's comments as anti-semitic. To do so is to get very close to the refrain that criticisms of the Sharon government are anti-semitic, which we also hear around here.

To: LindyBill who wrote (76729)	2/23/2003 1:30:11 PM
From: Rascal	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 281500

Lindy. You are wrong about Win. You, more than anyone on this board uses unflattering phrases to describe groups. Usually I just laugh because it appears you are in a time warp. "I think what hit me the hardest is the light bulb that went off in my head when I realized that this explained the constant refrain from Win about "Wolfowitz." And it finally made sense of his "Perle and company" remarks that he has been making for a year. I could never figure out his fixation on someone who was not even in the Government. Now I understand. " But, with your recent light bulb moment I must put you in a different category. Your comments make you dangerous. And you probably shade them here because you know how unfashionable we find them. I can imagine how you really speak among "Friends". I am very disappointed in what I have finally perceived in you. Rascal@ disgusted.com