SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Options 201: Beyond Obi-Wan-Kenobe -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: tyc:> who wrote (748)2/23/2003 1:21:31 PM
From: Louis V. Lambrecht  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1064
 
tyke- can we find a common ground for talking about volatility? Can't follow your argumentation.
crbtrader.com here de desc of IV.
FWIW I ike to use the ivolatility.com pages to compare IV to HV. Still free.
Optionetics had graphs and date for free for a long time, but asking a fee now.
The HV, as I understand it, has nothing to do with BBs, Chailkin or others, but is a part of the pricing process of an option.



To: tyc:> who wrote (748)2/23/2003 1:24:22 PM
From: Dominick  Respond to of 1064
 
How about that! I'm using the symbol AEM which has the last price bar as H-L-C of 14.16-13.57-13.70. Yours is AGE.TO.

I have a 50 ma of 14.24 and an upper BB of 15.59 which is a 9.5% move which is around 21% annulized,(9.5*2.245). According to my chart it hit the 50 ma and bounced back. Looks like 13 is the next stop here.

Dominick



To: tyc:> who wrote (748)2/26/2003 9:39:44 PM
From: At_The_Ask  Respond to of 1064
 
You may find this site useful. I've also been wondering if bb's might be a cheap way to see the volatility on stocks and if the width of the bands could be indicative of relative option prices. Good discussion.

ivolatility.com