SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Stockman Scott's Political Debate Porch -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (13365)2/24/2003 4:11:52 AM
From: stockman_scott  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 89467
 
Microsoft always seeking a fiscal fountain of youth

As growth slows, the company invests billions in new realms

By HELEN JUNG
THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
Monday, February 24, 2003

They're stats to die for: Market share of 90-plus percent. Profit margins of 80 percent. Stocks that have created thousands of millionaires in the Seattle area alone.

But behind those figures is Microsoft Corp.'s biggest challenge for the future: Just what is a monopolist to do next?

As growth slows for Microsoft's main products, the company has been aggressively expanding into new realms, investing billions in everything from selling video-game consoles to loaning small businesses money to buy its software.

Those new ventures, however, are losing millions of dollars -- and creating tensions with such big-name companies as IBM and Sony.

Meanwhile, slower profit growth and a now-listless stock price has intensified pressure on Microsoft to find a fiscal fountain of youth.

"It's become extremely critical for them to grow these other segments," said Rob Enderle, an analyst with Giga Information Group. "Otherwise the (stock) market will not be kind to them."

Microsoft maintains its growth prospects are strong. At an analysts' conference last month, Chief Financial Officer John Connors pledged "incredible products that change the world." Still, Connors acknowledged the question that has been hounding Microsoft lately: whether "those products translate into the kind of profitability we've had from some of the very incredible products we've done historically."

To be sure, the company remains the envy of businesses around the world.

At 28 years old, the company owns the market for desktop operating systems with Windows. Its co-founder, Bill Gates, is a star and the company's phenomenal rise in stock price is legendary: One share of Microsoft bought for $21 in its 1986 stock-market debut, with nine stock splits over the years, is now worth about $7,000.

Microsoft also continues to outpace the rest of the industry, pulling out profits while others desperately try to stem losses. For the second half of 2002, Microsoft earned a $5.3 billion profit on record revenue of $16.3 billion.

"They truly have been defying gravity by showing growth and strong financial performance at a time when (information technology) spending was down," said Eric Upin, software analyst with Wells Fargo Securities.

But that strong showing may be a sign of leaner times to come, analysts said.

The record revenue stemmed mostly from a change last year in how Microsoft charges bulk buyers of software.

The windfall from the shift to a subscription model won't continue forever, Upin said, and some companies are considering alternatives to Microsoft software. Upin thinks Microsoft has "a couple quarters left in the gas tank."

In addition, with the market for personal computers drastically slowing, there are fewer customers for Windows.

Analysts also say Microsoft will have a tougher time showing customers why they need costly upgrades to their Windows or Office software.

Perhaps the biggest sign of Microsoft's maturing came in January when the company announced its first-ever dividend, which analysts see as a response to increased frustrations among investors over the stagnating stock price while Microsoft hoards $43.4 billion in cash reserves.

But some say issuing a dividend is like admitting you can't throw a fastball. And Microsoft's decision to split its stock in February -- at prices lower than previous splits -- was seen by some as an effort to jump-start trading and regain the pattern of acrobatic leaps of the stock's younger days.

The moves are focusing attention on where the money is coming from -- and where it's not.

Microsoft's Windows, Office and Server businesses collectively provided 81 percent of company revenues for the second half of 2002.

The three sectors also boast huge operating profit margins of 83 percent, 78 percent and 32 percent, respectively.

From there, it's all about pouring money into areas Microsoft believes will someday deliver profits.

The four money-losing businesses -- its MSN Internet Service, Home and Entertainment segment including Xbox, Business Solutions for smaller companies and CE/Mobility software for wireless devices -- brought in a $3.2 billion combined in revenues but lost a little over $1 billion for the six months.

Those figures don't include another $905 million in losses that can't be attributed to any one business unit.

In many of its businesses, Microsoft is doing battle with some established competitors, including AOL Time Warner in the Internet access market, Sony in the video-game business, Nokia and Palm in wireless and IBM in selling software and services for companies.

Many have been bruised in previous brushes with Microsoft, and none intends to let a company synonymous with monopoly gain a dominant foothold in their industries.

Marty Shagrin, a research analyst with Victory Capital Management, wonders: How far are those money-losing Microsoft businesses from profitability -- and are they worth the effort?

"I don't think they're out in left field in what they're doing," Shagrin said.

"It's just the economics of it aren't clear yet."

MICROSOFT AT A GLANCE

Microsoft Corp. is split into seven business units. Here's a look at the divisions and some of their main products.

Client: Microsoft's Windows software is by far the dominant desktop operating system with more than 90 percent market share. The company is working on a new version, codenamed Longhorn.

Information Worker: Microsoft's Office suite of software and other business applications. Microsoft is slated to release a new version of Office this year. Profits from the Client and Information Worker segments fuel much of the company's investments. But analysts said Microsoft must prove to customers that the new versions will be worth the cost of upgrading.

Server Platforms: Microsoft's server software unit is profitable but the company faces a looming showdown with an elusive competitor - open-source Linux-based software. Many vendors, including IBM, are building software products on top of the free Linux source code, making the initial costs much lower than Microsoft's software. Both are gaining market share at the expense of older Unix-based systems, but analysts say they will eventually compete.

Home and Entertainment: This division includes Microsoft's Xbox video-game consoles and its new Xbox Live online video game service. Although the division has sold more than 8 million consoles since its launch in November 2001, sales were lower than expected. Sony's Playstation 2 remains the top dog worldwide.

MSN: The company came out with its most improved Internet browsing software yet, with the release of MSN 8. But with about 9 million subscribers at last count, it's still far behind Internet leader America Online, despite Microsoft's ongoing $300 million advertising campaign.

Business Solutions: With the purchase of business software companies Great Plains and Navision in the past two years, Microsoft has assembled a business unit that some analysts believe will have some of Microsoft's best growth opportunities -- the market of serving small and medium-sized businesses.

CE/Mobility: With the number of wireless devices exploding around the world, Microsoft is pushing hard to be the software provider of choice. But it's finding some of its toughest competition yet as rivals are striking deals to try to limit Microsoft's power in the emerging industry.

seattlepi.nwsource.com



To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (13365)2/24/2003 6:53:09 AM
From: stockman_scott  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 89467
 
-- Is Greenspan Being Tuned Out by Markets? --

By Wayne Cole

22-Feb-2003 13:50:21 GMT

NEW YORK (Reuters) - Maybe Alan Greenspan is no longer the
lionized "maestro" of old on Wall Street.

When the head of the world's most powerful central bank
drew the ire of the White House last week for his lukewarm
support of tax cuts, investors were reminded that Federal
Reserve chairmen are also mortal.

The word "resignation" was whispered, though a top
Republican generously conceded there was no reason for the Fed
chief to step aside right now.

Once even the hint of a suggestion that the great man would
not always be in charge would send markets into paroxysms of
self-doubt. This time all it drew was a yawn.

In part, this new equanimity is due to a belief that
Greenspan is too much a part of the political landscape to be
removed, even by a president as popular as George W. Bush.

But analysts also see it as a telling sign of how far from
grace the central bank, and the man himself, have fallen.

"Greenspan's too much of an institution for any president
to dump him," said Ram Bhagavatula, chief economist at Royal
Bank of Scotland Financial Markets in New York.

"But it's also the case that the magic's worn off Greenspan
and the Fed," he said. Having cut interest rates 12 times the
economy's only sputtering and, far more unforgivable to
investors, equities have still halved in value from the peak of
the bubble in 2000.

"People have opened their eyes and realized the Emperor has
no clothes," was Bhagavatula's verdict.

THE GREENSPAN PUT

It was an axiom of markets during the bubble, and indeed
may have helped inflate the stock market rally in the first
place, that the Greenspan Fed would do all in its power to
support asset prices and thus there was little risk in buying,
even at historically outlandish levels.

So pervasive was this idea that it became enshrined in
market folklore as the "Greenspan put."

The Fed itself has always claimed that monetary policy is
not set with asset prices in mind. Greenspan went so far as to
argue that there was nothing the bank could have done to stop
the bubble from growing.

But the same was not true when asset prices were falling so
far and fast that the fabric of business and consumer
confidence seemed to be threatened.

When that happened in 2001 the Fed felt fully justified in
slashing borrowing costs -- 11 cuts that year alone taking
interest rates to four-decade lows.

And yet stocks have not recovered. The S&P 500 currently
cowers around 830, leaving its 2000 peak of 1,553 a fond but
distant memory. The economy has done better but only in fits
and starts, and sustainable employment growth remains elusive.

In their defense, central bankers note monetary policy
works with long and variable lags, though that's harder to
argue when the bulk of the easing came more than a year ago.

The Fed can blame geopolitical uncertainty for holding back
the economy and Greenspan evinces confidence that all will be
well once the Iraq situation is resolved.

"Policy is pushing against a lot of headwinds right now and
maybe it's better to ask what the economy would be like without
all the easing; a lot worse I bet," argued Jim O'Sullivan, an
economist at UBS Warburg in Stamford, Conn.

"As for Greenspan, I'd have to fall back on a baseball
analogy. You're never as good as when you're winning and you're
never as bad when you're losing."

NO PROFIT IN SPECULATING

Others are not as kind, noting that lower borrowing costs
alone will not revive investment when industry is saddled with
massive unused capacity built during the bubble years of the
1990s.

Low interest rates are also a backdoor attempt at forcing
investors to take more risk since they mean sharply reduce
returns on safe investments like Treasuries and bank deposits.

But instead of fueling demand for stocks, private investors
have bought houses and cars. That has helped cushion the
broader economy but it's done little for Wall Street.

Perhaps it should be no surprise then that financial
markets have reacted so begrudgingly to the Fed's supposedly
aggressive rate cut in November. Or that investors now show
scant alarm at the prospect of a Fed without Greenspan.

Even the rumor mill has fallen silent. No longer do
speculators whip up talk of Greenspan in a car accident, or
Greenspan suffering a heart attack. There's no money in it.

"Frankly, I think he's overstayed his welcome and the
market will be glad to see the back of him," said Paul Kasriel,
chief economist at Northern Trust and a long-time critic of the
Fed in general and Greenspan in particular.

"It seems the Fed knows so little about so much that it
would be best for us all if it gave up trying to micro-manage
the economy," said Kasriel.

(C) Reuters 2003.