SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Jacob Snyder who wrote (76917)2/23/2003 7:55:59 PM
From: greenspirit  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 281500
 
Hi Jacob, well I must admit that one got me thinking and I had to do a bit of research on the web before I responded. I had actually forgotten about the War of 1812. The U.S. vs the confederacy was an internal struggle. Not a struggle between two democratic nations. And as you said, Hitler was...well Hitler, not much democracy there after his rise to power.

In the war of 1812 Spencer Perceval was the prime minister of Britain and was appointed by King Georgee III, who many believed was mad. He was assasinated in 1812. Lord Liverpool was appointed to replace him. None were democratically elected, especially King George III. So, it looks like my statement still stands up under scrutiny if given a bit of slack... :)



To: Jacob Snyder who wrote (76917)2/23/2003 8:00:54 PM
From: LindyBill  Respond to of 281500
 
1) Naahh. We put down a rebellion. The Confederacy was not a recognized country.--In spite of the Hell I will catch from our southerners.

2) Nazi Germany had not been a Democracy since at least 1934. After the takeover, Hitler supressed all dissent.

3) 1812 was between a King and a Democracy.