SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: paul_philp who wrote (76972)2/23/2003 10:53:04 PM
From: Condor  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 281500
 
Labor breaks off coalition talks after Likud signs accord with National Religious Party based on understanding with Shinui (Change)

On the National news tonight, their interpretation of it was that this would result in a hard move to the right and put the kaibosh to a Pal state. Basically as I understand it, the Labour party was a moderating influence.

C



To: paul_philp who wrote (76972)2/23/2003 11:03:03 PM
From: Nadine Carroll  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
Labor breaks off coalition talks after Likud signs accord with National Religious Party based on understanding with Shinui (Change)

Translation: Mitzna walked out and the rest of Labor, from Shimon Peres down, is mad as hell at him.
jpost.com

My take: it ain't over until the fat lady sings. Sharon has about three more weeks to form a government. The Likud/NRP/Shinui coalition is his Plan B government. He's stalling on signing the deal
jpost.com

Sharon really wants a National Unity Government and so does the Bush adminstration (who has been making not-so-subtle threats to make some of Israel's aid money conditional on it). In three weeks, there will probably be a war on in Iraq, and then Labor can dive into a face-saving National Emergency Government, with or without Amran Mitzna. But who knows for sure with this cast of characters? But that's my take until I see evidence to the contrary.