Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : DON'T START THE WAR -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: PartyTime who wrote (12243)	2/23/2003 11:46:02 PM
From: Vitas	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 25898

try looking at the replies and tell me what you see funny that you who has pointed to every poll under the sun lately as being very definitive should now say they don't mean anything typical ------------------------------------------------------ To:Vitas who wrote (11718) From: Ilmarinen Saturday, Feb 22, 2003 8:40 AM Respond to of 12245 4. Well, the possible next UN resolution is the one supposed to define conditions for war, not 1441. That is why Bush&Co uses words like "the sovereign right of USA", "pre-emptive strike against future attacks" and why it is so important to have some Al-Qaeda in the no-fly-zones where Saddam cannot easily get to them. To:Vitas who wrote (11718) From: X the Unknown Saturday, Feb 22, 2003 10:31 AM Respond to of 12245 number 2- but use only the deadlines the rest of the world will go along with. Iraq is not enough of a threat to piss off the entire ME, nor is it dangerous enough that it should distract us from going after Al Qaeda. I would prefer our interventions to make some sense, and Iraq, for me, and for most of the rest of the world, doesn't look like a sensible target. If and when the rest of the world sees it a real axis of evil, let's go in- but only with UN approval. We may need the goodwill of the rest of the world at some point. Seems silly to blow it over Iraq. Of course we've already done blown quite a bit of goodwill, but an actual solo invasion would only make things much much worse. To:Vitas who wrote (11718) From: albert kovalyov Saturday, Feb 22, 2003 10:33 AM Respond to of 12245 5. WAR To:Vitas who wrote (11718) From: jlallen Saturday, Feb 22, 2003 11:18 AM Respond to of 12245 #3. And no later than the first week of March. To:Vitas who wrote (11718) From: Lazarus Long Saturday, Feb 22, 2003 12:37 PM Respond to of 12245 #3. Anyone who can't see the games Saddam is playing is intentionally obtuse. Do it quickly and get it over with. To:Vitas who wrote (11718) From: Mighty_Mezz Sunday, Feb 23, 2003 11:29 AM View Replies (1) \| Respond to of 12245 4