SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Sig who wrote (77155)2/24/2003 2:06:20 PM
From: michael97123  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
Sig,
The US might get its 9 votes here for a resolution that only states facts, not threatens. Then the US would be free to act and the French could continue to oppose the war even if they go along with this resolution. I guess the french position is that although the facts are what they are, we should allow more time. US/GB positions are the facts reflect a material breach and that means war. Mike



To: Sig who wrote (77155)2/24/2003 2:06:29 PM
From: LindyBill  Respond to of 281500
 
So will the French and Germans stand up in the meeting and say that Iraq met the requirements of 1441.?

This is the "Half resolution" that I have been talking about. it is "Veto Proof." And it gives Blair cover.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News