Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : DON'T START THE WAR -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lazarus_Long who wrote (12457)	2/24/2003 10:01:19 PM
From: louisebaltimore	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 25898

I said "technically," because I don't feel that I violated the TOU in spirit. If you're really interested (which I doubt), you can start here: Message 18566141 Just go as far as you can with the exchange between me and Stoolie. Should bring you here: siliconinvestor.com My response (which has since been deleted by SI) to that post was to ask Stoolie if he considered calling me "silly" an epithet. I tagged my question with an actual epithet, a common 3-letter/4 letter word combo. Here is Stoolie's response: Message 18566725 My reply (which has since been deleted by SI) to that was to point out to Stoolie which word in the sentence was the epithet. I was merely instructing the poor lad. I don't go around calling people names as a matter of course. Look at any of my posts. Other than calling Powell a dupe (well, wash my mouth out with soap!), I think I called bill a parrot a few times, but that's about it. Contrast that against any sampling of Stoolie posts. SI should have deleted my posts, sent me a nasty PM and left it at that, imo. Water over the bridge now, though, so I have nothing more to say on the subject.