SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Stockman Scott's Political Debate Porch -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (13446)2/24/2003 11:53:17 PM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 89467
 
Jobs and George Bush's Economy...

Your job: How scared should you be?

Perhaps plenty. New data shows employers are slowing down on hiring.

February 24, 2003: 5:26 AM EST

By Leslie Haggin Geary, CNN/Money Staff Writer

New York (CNN/Money) - The recovery in the job market isn't here yet.

That's the consensus of the most recent jobs survey by Manpower Inc., which found that employers nationwide are scaling back plans to add workers to their payrolls. The survey, released Monday, is the latest indicator that hiring has hit another roadblock.

That news will deal a blow to those who've lost jobs -- or those who worry they might join the ranks of the unemployed. Experts aren't mincing words. Their advice? Tighten your personal financial belt and be prepared for a bumpy ride ahead.

"We've been digging out of a recession from a labor perspective and now we've hit the second quarter of 2003 and companies are saying, 'I'm slowing down,' " said Manpower CEO and Chairman, Jeffrey A. Joerres. "The momentum they've been building has lost ground."

Employers scale back plans to hire

At first blush, the Manpower report offers a glimmer of an upturn: More employers plan to hire from April to June this year than the first quarter of the year -- or 22 percent versus 20 percent. Nine percent will lay off staff, down from 12 percent in the first quarter. And 63 percent of companies will hold staff levels steady, according to the survey.

But the first quarter of the year is always the slowest in terms of hiring, said Joerres. In other words, quarter-over-quarter hiring should be expected to rise between the second quarter and the first. The problem is that expectations are for such small gains.

A combination of factors may be to blame. Uncertainty over a war with Iraq doesn't help. But with little new demand for products and services, companies are generally holding staff levels steady, rather than increasing payrolls in expectation of rebounding performance.

In fact, as of March 2001, the official start of the recession, some 1.6 million jobs have been eliminated entirely. Today, national unemployment levels stand at 5.7 percent.

Unemployed for longer, many quit trying

Many who've received pink slips are still pounding the pavement for work. One in five individuals who are out of work - some 1.7 million job seekers - have been unemployed for more than six months.

"It's not getting better right now," agrees John Challenger, CEO of the outplacement firm Challenger, Gray & Christmas. "We've been thinking recovery is six months away for two years running now. But we may be in period of doldrums for a while."

A lingering cause of concern is the number of long-term unemployed, many of whom have simply given up and stopped looking for work.

"This isn't the highest level of long-term unemployment we've ever seen. In the early 1990's, there were lots of people out of work for a long time," said Ryan Helwig, economist at the Bureau of Labor Statistics. "But even with positive economic growth, we've seen a continued decline in payroll employment and an unemployment rate that hasn't begun to decline."

Regional recoveries

Certain industries and parts of the country are faring better than others, according to Manpower's survey.

Job seekers in the South have the greatest prospects to find work; 29 percent of industries there expect to hire while 7 percent expect layoffs. Conversely, employers in the Northeast - encompassing the Mid-Atlantic and New England states, as well as New York - show the weakest outlook. Some 11 percent will decrease staff levels in coming months while 21 percent hope to add workers.

Joerres says there are glimmers of hope. He points to the new hiring findings among makers of durable goods like heavy equipment, furniture, steel and computers. Nationally, 10 percent will hire in the second quarter, up from the 3 percent in 2001. That growth indicates that employment in the manufacturing sector, which has been heavily beaten down in the past two years, may be stabilizing after years of erosion

Experts are quick to note, however, that there's a big difference between stabilization and growth. In fact, companies who are replacing inventories of, say, computers or other durable goods are most likely replacing old equipment rather than gearing up for sustained growth.

Areas that have been doing well include health care, defense and security and real estate. Last week, the National Association of Home Builders reported that builders started to work on 1.85 million homes in January - a 16-year high.

Industries that continue to lag include telecommunications, technology and travel. Jobs in government also are losing ground. In fact, according to the Manpower study, hiring for government jobs will slip 2 percent from April through June.

That's the worst industry performance for the Manpower survey, but not surprising. While government workers are expected to retire in droves in coming years and there's been a demand for security workers, states and localities nationwide are grappling with stratospheric deficits. Some have watched their bond ratings get cut as a result of their fiscal woes. Others are trying to shore up pension plan funds and find money for Medicaid spending. And many are holding off on hiring.

Hedging against hard times

The best defense against uncertainty? Take steps to protect yourself by keeping adequate cash reserves and adjusting your investments to meet your risk tolerance and making sure you've got an ideal budget. (To create one, click here.)

Meanwhile, be leery of even good deals. Low interest rates have fueled home and car-buying sprees, but be sure you can afford them.

Warns Challenger: "Make sure you have money in the bank. This is the time to be cautious. Don't think the turn is right around the corner."



To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (13446)2/25/2003 12:02:29 AM
From: stockman_scott  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 89467
 
3 reasons to expect a war rally

I see the financial markets rallying in the near future, but don't expect it to last. The big problems that bedeviled the economy before the war will still be with us when it's over.

By Bill Fleckenstein

Financial pundits have always gravitated toward simplistic reasoning. It's no different now as, against the backdrop of a looming battle with Iraq, they paint a prospective war rally in simplistic terms. As an antidote, in this week's Contrarian Chronicles, we'll look at the complex mosaic surrounding a potential war rally, and see how rationalization may shape its length and breadth...

moneycentral.msn.com



To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (13446)2/25/2003 4:19:24 AM
From: stockman_scott  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 89467
 
jw: Ya gotta love these jokers from The Fed and their 'predictions' <G>...I agree that corporate integrity is key BUT I do not see a swift recovery once we have clarity about the war with Iraq...We are still dealing with a very fragile economy and it has some tremendous structural problems to grapple with.
___________________________________________________

Fed's Santomero sees robust recovery as risks fade
Monday February 24, 9:36 pm ET
By Jared Orzolek

WILKES-BARRE, Pennsylvania, Feb 24 (Reuters) - Philadelphia Federal Reserve Bank President Anthony Santomero said on Monday the U.S. economic recovery will pick up speed once uncertainties about a possible war with Iraq have faded.

He said a combination of geopolitical uncertainty and concerns about corporate scandals have weighed on the economy and slowed the recovery from the 2001 recession.

"The reality is this will be behind us, the geopolitical risk will subside and the economy will have a recovery that will be robust and long, and we will look back on this period as a transition period in U.S. economic history," Santomero said.

He was responding to questions after a speech at Wilkes University in Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania.

Santomero's comments echoed those of Fed Chairman Alan Greenspan earlier this month, who suggested if "uncertainties" stemming from the Iraq situation are short-lived, the economy may be poised to grow without fresh stimulus.

Businesses have been loath to hire workers or invest in new equipment in recent months as the prospect of war loomed closer, and a survey by the Philadelphia Federal Reserve released last week found 40 percent of companies cited war risks as the main reason for soft spending plans.

Santomero does not have a vote on the Fed's policy-making committee this year.

CORPORATE INTEGRITY IS KEY

Earlier, in a speech, Santomero said good corporate governance is critical to the health of the U.S. financial system and the economy.

"Our economy will be stronger if corporate decisions are made with competence and integrity, and if shareholders and the public can appropriately assess the profitability and riskiness of corporations' business activities," Santomero told a "Corporate Governance and Responsibility" seminar.

"Good corporate governance is critical to the health of the corporate system, our financial system, and our economy," Santomero said.

He said the Federal Reserve has had some success with the evolving model of corporate governance in its experience as regulator of the U.S. banking system, by stressing a broad assessment of risk and internal controls.

"For instance, despite the economic downturn in 2001, most banks continue to be in good health," Santomero said.

To restore public confidence in the integrity of corporate America, companies had to show a strong commitment to rigorous standards of corporate governance, the central banker said.

He cited a recent poll that found 77 percent of the public believes CEO greed and corruption caused the recent stock market declines.

"Yet, the continued success of our economic system requires the confidence and trust of investors, employees, consumers, and the public at large. In short, there is much work to be done," Santomero said.

Weighing in on the debate between strict rules and more general principles in the reform effort, Santomero said there are strong arguments in favor of principles-based accounting, since innovations in the financial system can open up loopholes in rules.

"When loopholes open, inappropriate or unethical actions that are not specifically prohibited by the rules can take place," he said.



To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (13446)2/25/2003 5:29:15 AM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 89467
 
Real estate, bear, gold funds still shine

By AMY BALDWIN
THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
Monday, February 24, 2003

NEW YORK -- Throughout Wall Street's three-year decline, three fund sectors -- gold, real estate and so-called bear-market funds -- have been a haven for investors, providing solid returns that offset some of the overall market's losses. The popular wisdom is that these funds have the best of their gains behind them, but some analysts say it's not too late to buy into them.

With the economy still sputtering and the possibility of war with Iraq depressing the market, havens, or defensive sectors, still appeal to many investors.

"A year ago, I thought gold had run out of steam, and I was wrong. So, there is always upside potential in these defensive-minded investments," said Jeff Tjornehoj, an analyst with fund tracker Lipper Inc. "With so much up in the air, I see some continued decent returns."

Still, investors should also be careful, because these sectors can be volatile and the funds within them are often expensive, carrying expense ratios of 2 percent or more. And, there is a risk in focusing too much on stellar past performance, which doesn't guarantee that future returns will be just as stunning.

"On the positive side, obviously you have the very high returns that these funds posted last year, but investors always need to be careful about chasing performance. And, gold and the gold funds are highly volatile," said Lynn Russell, a metals analyst at Morningstar, another fund-research company. "I would warn against investors rushing to chase performance given high (fund) prices and high volatility in this category."

Russell said investors should also be wary of gold funds because the metal itself is trading at six-year highs.

It's easy to see why these three fund varieties -- gold, bear market and real estate -- are attractive. Of the 41 equity-fund categories tracked by Lipper, only these three ended last year with positive returns: gold funds with a return of 63.3 percent; specialty diversified funds, which use techniques that work well in a bear market, with a return of 10.2 percent; and real estate funds, returning 4.2 percent.

Gold funds have enjoyed by far the best performance, beating out all other types of stock funds throughout the bear period. Gold funds have an annualized two-year return of 39.1 percent, an annualized three-year return of 21.7 and an annualized five-year return of 7.5 percent, according to Lipper.

And, so far this year, gold funds have a return of 1.4 percent, second only to China region funds with a return of 5 percent, according to Lipper. All other fund varieties have posted negative returns so far for 2003.

Aside from gold and China region funds, specialty diversified equity funds are the only group with a positive return so far for the year. According to Lipper, these funds have a return of 0.7 percent, largely attributable to so-called bear funds. Bear-fund managers follow strategies that are rewarded when the market falls; that accounts for their two-year annualized return of 10.4 percent and a three-year annualized return of 8.9 percent.

Although real estate funds have a negative return of 2.4 percent so far this year, they have an annualized three-year return of 11.6 percent, according to Lipper.

seattlepi.nwsource.com