To: tejek who wrote (162034 ) 2/25/2003 12:37:23 AM From: jjayxxxx Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1583741 <Who is supposed to supply the WMD for them to inventory and destroy?> They search for WMD based on information they have from intelligence and other sources. Ahhh. Well, here we differ. I think in order for Iraq to disarm (peacefully), Iraq is the one that has to do it. Why don't you see this? Are you just disagreeing because you've nothing better to do? You don't seriously think that we can find the proverbial needle in a haystack with a bunch of inspectors? Sure we might find one needle, but will that be all of them...? I've often wondered why Saddam doesn't offer up some WMD's just to say "see, here they are" and basically get the UN off his back and then hold a bunch hidden in reserve anyway. But by saying "nope, ain't got none, none at all" he's making Bush's case easier.No guarantees. Can you guarantee that we will take Saddam out and there will not repercussions to Americans and American territory? No guarantees, but I think there is less risk in taking out Saddam and having a democratically run Iraq than any scenario where we leave him in power.You don't see a middle ground but I do. Okay, I'll bite. What is your middle ground? (I make a good straight man, eh? <g>)<Stringing it out only allows Iraq more time to prepare more WMD either for use or for sale.> Doesn't that assume they have a lot of WMD? How do you know that? How did you come to that conclusion? More time only benefits Saddam is what I am saying. Not sure what you are getting at (but then again I am pretty tired <g>).......you're always so generous It is one of my better traits. In fact, I am feeling so generous, I am going to give you the last word, as I know how much it means to you. Later, JJ P.S. Enter symbols or keywords for search: QuotesStock TalkChartsNewsPeople Symbol Lookup Subject Titles Only Full Text Go to Top Terms of Use Got a comment, question or suggestion? Contact Silicon Investor.