SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (153654)2/24/2003 11:55:14 PM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 164687
 
Jobs and George Bush's Economy...

Your job: How scared should you be?

Perhaps plenty. New data shows employers are slowing down on hiring.

February 24, 2003: 5:26 AM EST

By Leslie Haggin Geary, CNN/Money Staff Writer

New York (CNN/Money) - The recovery in the job market isn't here yet.

That's the consensus of the most recent jobs survey by Manpower Inc., which found that employers nationwide are scaling back plans to add workers to their payrolls. The survey, released Monday, is the latest indicator that hiring has hit another roadblock.

That news will deal a blow to those who've lost jobs -- or those who worry they might join the ranks of the unemployed. Experts aren't mincing words. Their advice? Tighten your personal financial belt and be prepared for a bumpy ride ahead.

"We've been digging out of a recession from a labor perspective and now we've hit the second quarter of 2003 and companies are saying, 'I'm slowing down,' " said Manpower CEO and Chairman, Jeffrey A. Joerres. "The momentum they've been building has lost ground."

Employers scale back plans to hire

At first blush, the Manpower report offers a glimmer of an upturn: More employers plan to hire from April to June this year than the first quarter of the year -- or 22 percent versus 20 percent. Nine percent will lay off staff, down from 12 percent in the first quarter. And 63 percent of companies will hold staff levels steady, according to the survey.

But the first quarter of the year is always the slowest in terms of hiring, said Joerres. In other words, quarter-over-quarter hiring should be expected to rise between the second quarter and the first. The problem is that expectations are for such small gains.

A combination of factors may be to blame. Uncertainty over a war with Iraq doesn't help. But with little new demand for products and services, companies are generally holding staff levels steady, rather than increasing payrolls in expectation of rebounding performance.

In fact, as of March 2001, the official start of the recession, some 1.6 million jobs have been eliminated entirely. Today, national unemployment levels stand at 5.7 percent.

Unemployed for longer, many quit trying

Many who've received pink slips are still pounding the pavement for work. One in five individuals who are out of work - some 1.7 million job seekers - have been unemployed for more than six months.

"It's not getting better right now," agrees John Challenger, CEO of the outplacement firm Challenger, Gray & Christmas. "We've been thinking recovery is six months away for two years running now. But we may be in period of doldrums for a while."

A lingering cause of concern is the number of long-term unemployed, many of whom have simply given up and stopped looking for work.

"This isn't the highest level of long-term unemployment we've ever seen. In the early 1990's, there were lots of people out of work for a long time," said Ryan Helwig, economist at the Bureau of Labor Statistics. "But even with positive economic growth, we've seen a continued decline in payroll employment and an unemployment rate that hasn't begun to decline."

Regional recoveries

Certain industries and parts of the country are faring better than others, according to Manpower's survey.

Job seekers in the South have the greatest prospects to find work; 29 percent of industries there expect to hire while 7 percent expect layoffs. Conversely, employers in the Northeast - encompassing the Mid-Atlantic and New England states, as well as New York - show the weakest outlook. Some 11 percent will decrease staff levels in coming months while 21 percent hope to add workers.

Joerres says there are glimmers of hope. He points to the new hiring findings among makers of durable goods like heavy equipment, furniture, steel and computers. Nationally, 10 percent will hire in the second quarter, up from the 3 percent in 2001. That growth indicates that employment in the manufacturing sector, which has been heavily beaten down in the past two years, may be stabilizing after years of erosion

Experts are quick to note, however, that there's a big difference between stabilization and growth. In fact, companies who are replacing inventories of, say, computers or other durable goods are most likely replacing old equipment rather than gearing up for sustained growth.

Areas that have been doing well include health care, defense and security and real estate. Last week, the National Association of Home Builders reported that builders started to work on 1.85 million homes in January - a 16-year high.

Industries that continue to lag include telecommunications, technology and travel. Jobs in government also are losing ground. In fact, according to the Manpower study, hiring for government jobs will slip 2 percent from April through June.

That's the worst industry performance for the Manpower survey, but not surprising. While government workers are expected to retire in droves in coming years and there's been a demand for security workers, states and localities nationwide are grappling with stratospheric deficits. Some have watched their bond ratings get cut as a result of their fiscal woes. Others are trying to shore up pension plan funds and find money for Medicaid spending. And many are holding off on hiring.

Hedging against hard times

The best defense against uncertainty? Take steps to protect yourself by keeping adequate cash reserves and adjusting your investments to meet your risk tolerance and making sure you've got an ideal budget. (To create one, click here.)

Meanwhile, be leery of even good deals. Low interest rates have fueled home and car-buying sprees, but be sure you can afford them.

Warns Challenger: "Make sure you have money in the bank. This is the time to be cautious. Don't think the turn is right around the corner."



To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (153654)2/25/2003 1:23:53 AM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 164687
 
Sources: Iraq Agrees To Full Compliance With Inspectors

Feb 25, 2003

stratfor.biz

Former Russian Prime Minister Yevgeny Primakov, reputed to be a personal friend of Iraqi President Saddam Hussein, made a lightning visit to Baghdad on Feb. 23. The purpose and results of the meeting are shrouded in secrecy, apart from a statement by Moscow that Hussein was asked -- and agreed -- to cooperate fully with U.N. weapons inspectors.
Reliable Stratfor sources within the Russian government say Hussein indeed has promised to cooperate with the inspectors' demands -- including that Baghdad scrap its al Samoud 2 missile program by March 1, an announcement that sources expect to be forthcoming within days.

The importance of the meeting stretches much further, however. Sources say the Iraqi leader has agreed to a proposal by Russian President Vladimir Putin -- previously discussed between Russian, French and German leaders -- that Baghdad formally invite U.N. peacekeepers within the next 10 days or so to back up weapons inspectors. This, sources say, would show the world that Iraq will be unconditionally disarmed under strict and fully enforceable U.N. deadlines, with peacekeepers staying on in Iraq until the task is complete.

Sources also say that Hussein has asked Putin to deliver a secret offer to U.S. and British energy giants, inviting them back to Iraq as major industry players roughly 30 years after they were ousted from the country. The companies could return to Iraq immediately if Washington calls off its planned invasion.

On Feb. 24, Vladimir Voloshin -- the head of Russia's presidential administration -- left Moscow for Washington, where he is likely to deliver that message to President George W. Bush. The choice of Voloshin as a diplomatic envoy is highly unusual, because he focuses on managing Russia's internal affairs and has never been dispatched in this way before.

Voloshin also will brief U.S. leaders on other aspects of the discussion between Primakov and Hussein. The ultimate goal of this visit is to persuade the Bush administration that Iraq will be disarmed to such a point that it not only will be unable to threaten U.S. and Israeli forces for years to come, but would be unable to resist a U.S. invasion if Washington deems it necessary to attack Iraq in the future. If Washington is at least partly receptive to this message and to Hussein's promises, a second meeting between Primakov and Hussein likely will result.

If intelligence from Stratfor sources is correct, the Bush administration could save face by claiming that Iraq's true disarmament was reached only through U.S. military pressure. Putin already has called British Prime Minister Tony Blair and French President Jacques Chirac to convey details of the Primakov meeting. Sources say Chirac was enthusiastic about the proposal, and that Blair has also reacted favorably. But the fate of the proposal rests with Washington.

The Bush administration's reaction at this point is far from clear. The proposal would not achieve Washington's two main goals in Iraq: regime change and a new base for U.S. forces in the Middle East. However, as the costs of war continue to pile up, the Russian proposal could be considered a face-saving exit for Washington.

The ultimate decision likely will come down to Bush administration advisers -- including former U.S. President George H.W. Bush -- who will weigh the risks involved for the current president's re-election plans and the U.S. geopolitical stance as a whole. At this point, we believe the Bush administration will reject Hussein's overtures and Putin's proposal. But there will be more to the story: Last minute-attempts to block or promote the war will continue within the U.N. Security Council and possibly involving a second trip by Primakov to Baghdad.

Copyright 2002 Strategic Forecasting LLC. All rights reserved



To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (153654)2/25/2003 3:45:47 AM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 164687
 
The French paid dearly for imperial and military hubris. Listen up, U.S.

A Tip on Iraq From Those Who Walked That Road
By Robert Scheer
Columnist
The Los Angeles Times
February 25, 2003

The alliances on "Survivor" have more stability and logic than those currently held by the United States. We need a weekly two-hour special to keep us in the know.

Did we buy off Turkey yet? Hey, what's $15 billion for a mercenary in need? And is Syria, the sworn enemy of our enemy, Saddam Hussein, our new friend?

Oh, and if Pakistan is the dictatorship that backed the Taliban, why are we covering our ears and humming the theme to "Friends" whenever anyone talks about its nukes and scary collaboration with North Korea?

We suddenly like those U.S. flag-burners in Tehran -- possessors of a nuclear weapons program Hussein can only dream of -- so much that we have given their boys in the Northern Alliance the keys to Kabul, and now we might open the back door for them to take over Shiite southern Iraq.

On the other hand, old ally Germany and new ally Russia have both been downgraded to a status below lap dog Bulgaria for daring to suggest that Emperor Bush is without clothes; while uppity China is getting a reprieve because, as our second-largest trading partner, it keeps Wal-Mart stocked with patriotic animatronic toys. If we weren't worried about burning the waffles, we'd probably have lobbed a few cruise missiles into antiwar Belgium by now.

Nutty Pyongyang is receiving a mix of strained patience and physical restraints, while we apparently think another round of electroshock therapy is the cure for troubled Iraq.

And while we like Iraq's Kurds and Shiites now, they'd best be advised to cash in before the next immunity challenge, when they could be on the short end of the stick of whatever malleable Iraqi general we handpick to run our new oil fields.

Is all this shuffling of friends and foes just realpolitik, similar to how we ignore the mayhem of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict as an inconvenient sideshow? Like when President Reagan was cutting secret arms deals with Tehran's fundamentalists, even as he sent Donald Rumsfeld to Baghdad in 1984 to reaffirm our support for Iraq after the U.N. documented its use of poison gas on Iranian troops?

Despite this confusing picture then and now, thanks to our enlightened talk-show hosts we all know that there is one nation of pure evil, one nasty country threatening to undermine the world's security with its lies, double-dealing and stubborn defiance, one state that Earth would simply be better off without.

We're talking, of course, about France. Brie eaters. Surly waiters. WWII collaborators. And now, cowardly traitors in the crusade against the New Hitler.

This idiocy is based on a highly selective historical memory, including the fact that the U.S. refused to enter the war against Hitler until after France fell. It also keeps us from being able to listen to a nation that has already been down the road we are traveling.

Imperialism has always been pitched at home as a win-win way to help the world's stricken peoples while helping oneself, and in Paris it was no different. France's colonial wars were waged under the rival banners of Catholicism and the French Revolution; the goal was to civilize the natives. A million Frenchmen gave up the joys of life at the center of Europe to colonize Algeria alone, building schools, churches, hospitals and civic bureaucracies.

Ultimately, however, the price of France's hubris was writ large in the blood of its sons and daughters over painful decades, from the fall of Dien Bien Phu to the Battle of Algiers, from the student protests of '68 to the bombs that terrorized Paris.

One of the fallen was a French soldier-cum-journalist named Bernard Fall. He died when he stepped on a Viet Cong land mine while accompanying a U.S. patrol, but not before he had written compellingly about the inevitable stench of imperial ambition turning rancid. But let's let Colin Powell explain.

"I recently read Bernard Fall's book on Vietnam, 'Street Without Joy,' " the secretary of State and Vietnam vet wrote in his 1995 autobiography. "Fall makes painfully clear that we had almost no understanding of what we had gotten ourselves into. I cannot help thinking that if President Kennedy or President Johnson had spent a quiet weekend at Camp David reading that perceptive book, they would have returned to the White House Monday morning and immediately started to figure out a way to extricate us from the quicksand of Vietnam."

Many believe that the U.S. is simply incapable of imperialism or even of being wrong, that we are the divinely designated agent of democracy, that gleaming City on the Hill so frequently mentioned by Reagan. But the lesson of France is that merely riding in under the banner of liberty is no guarantee that you or those you "liberate" won't regret you ever left home.

latimes.com



To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (153654)2/25/2003 9:45:04 AM
From: Bill Harmond  Respond to of 164687
 
washingtonpost.com



To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (153654)2/25/2003 12:13:49 PM
From: GST  Respond to of 164687
 
Did you see the consumer confidence numbers today? The economy is not in good shape. Our "uniltaral regime change policy" is has indeed turned out to be a fiasco on al scores.



To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (153654)2/25/2003 4:27:14 PM
From: craig crawford  Respond to of 164687
 
Eggs 'protect against breast cancer'
news.bbc.co.uk

Eggs Today May Beat Breast Cancer Tomorrow
story.news.yahoo.com

Teen's Diet May Affect Breast Cancer Risk
story.news.yahoo.com

NEW YORK (Reuters Health) - Teens who eat one egg every day may be somewhat protected from developing breast cancer later in life, according to new research.