SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Canadian Oil & Gas Companies -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Richard Saunders who wrote (9627)2/25/2003 8:57:35 AM
From: kingfisher  Respond to of 24898
 
Duke Energy.

To: Senior Leadership Team

Fortune magazine will announce in the March 3rd, 2003 issue that Duke Energy
has earned the #1 position in the Energy category of its annual survey of
"America's Most Admired Companies." The ratings are based on a survey
conducted in the 4th quarter of 2002. Across all 50+ industries over 10,000
executives, directors and analysts participated.

Our industry and company have been adversely affected by a long and
continuing stream of negative announcements and news stories. This is a
critical issue because, over time, it can erode the core of the brand's
foundation -- its trust relationship with its stakeholders. Unanswered,
unresolved, the negative stream of communication creates doubt about who we
are and how we do business. Perhaps more than ever before, reputation and
brand matters.

Being named the "Most Admired" company again in 2002 is not just "good
news." This is precisely the kind of message needed at this time. This
recognition is not just our view. This is an independent assessment of the
company from an important constituency -- business executives and financial
analysts. We have repeated an overall #1 performance score in the Energy
category after a tumultuous year for the industry. Not just a "corporate
beauty contest," the composite score is based on ratings in the following
criteria: social responsibility, long-term investment value, employee
talent, quality of products/services, innovation, use of corporate assets,
financial soundness, and quality of management.

This is an important message that needs to be heard by a broad set of
stakeholders. And it needs to be heard now. It has relevance internally
and externally, across various audiences, and at the executive and middle
management levels. Please support carrying the message to the following key
stakeholders:
Employees
Customers and potential customers
Communities where we do business
Financial analysts
Investors and potential investors
Policy makers.

The Market & Brand Strategy and Public Affairs teams have developed an
integrated communication strategy and tool set. Our primary objective is to
thank stakeholders and customers for their support and contribution toward
our ability to be viewed in this leadership position within our industry.
The following vehicles and tools will be used to support broad communication
to key stakeholders:
Press Release: Tuesday, February 25, 2003
Headline and link: Duke-Energy.com & My Duke Energy.com
Headline and link: Employee Portal
Sales deployment kit containing article reprints and mailing tools
Customer event support tools

As we accept this award, we should do so with open eyes and take the
opportunity to learn from the findings contained in this year's research
(summary below).

Duke Energy's Scorecard 2003
Fortune's Eight Key Attributes of Reputation Score Rank
Innovativeness 5.33
2
Employee Talent 6.56 1
Use of Corporate Assets 5.94 1
Social Responsibility 6.41
1
Quality of Management 6.89
1
Financial Soundness 6.89
1
Long-Term Investment Value 6.50
1
Quality of Products & Service 6.94
1

Duke Energy ranks in the top position in 7 out of 8 categories surveyed
within our industry. However, the Energy industry as a whole experienced a
significant decline. Our absolute scores also declined year over year in
every category from an overall average of 7.47 in 2002 to an average of 6.43
in 2003.

The results of this survey are not a surprise given the difficult year our
industry has endured. These results do underscore the importance of
rebuilding our brand and reputation as key priorities in the months ahead.



To: Richard Saunders who wrote (9627)2/27/2003 4:37:14 PM
From: Giraffe  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 24898
 
Still following PRD?

They were under .05 in December and are now back over .20 with a bit of volume. I see there's been a recent PP.