Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: paul_philp who wrote (77536)	2/25/2003 6:04:27 PM
From: kumar	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

I fail to see how that article would convince John Doe in UK or Australia or France or Germany to change their view point.

To: paul_philp who wrote (77536)	2/25/2003 9:46:37 PM
From: Rascal	Respond to of 281500

Or, the US administration is holding the UN accountable for it's ineffectiveness, indecision and inaction. Let's have leadership that doesn't annoy anyone, let's be nice to everyone, let's not tell the incompetents that they are incompetent. Please explain who or what at the UN is guilty of the charges above? Is it Kofi Anan? Negroponte..Well there I can see some issues. Is it the building at 42nd Street/ TO me, I thought the United Nations was really an extension of the United States. You know they both have the same first name. And with the headquarters in NY. And don't we pay for most of everything one way or the other? Who or what is this that must change/do/go/ etc? We could sort things out if President Bush makes the UN a Cabinet Department. Department of Foreign Affairs. Yeah, that works. Rascal@ whateverhappenedtotheleague?com