Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : DON'T START THE WAR -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: PartyTime who wrote (13069)	2/26/2003 12:04:51 AM
From: ajax99	Respond to of 25898

now there is the real risk - and they do not see it - I know love is blind - but do all these people love Bush? we now know Albert wants to love the french but can't

To: PartyTime who wrote (13069)	2/26/2003 1:37:35 AM
From: Lazarus_Long	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 25898

THAT'S THE SECOND TIME YOU'VE TOLD THAT LIE! HIstory shows he uses them defensively, not offensively. So Saddam's invasion of Iran was DEFENSIVE????????? So: Let's see, not very long ago you were arguing he didn't have any. Now he does, but he uses them only "defensively". Even if that were true, what prevents him from using them offensively rather than defensively? And in any case, his possession of them is in violation of numerous UN resolutions and the cease fire agreement. But, what the hell, that's just a scrap of paper, right? Biological weapons? The latest news from Blix says YES, he does have them. Which is no surprise and is also in violation of resolutions and the cease fire. What the hell is wrong with you? Are you an Iraqi agent? You sure sound like it. You can't seem to think of enough excuse to make for your hero Saddam.