Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Nuvo Research Inc -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: russet who wrote (12160)	2/26/2003 1:33:47 AM
From: axial	Respond to of 14101

Russett, there are requests for clarification and substantiation that have gone unanswered. Nobody is denying your right to make unverifiable statements, but investors are justified in dismissing claims that can't be supported. Message 18609716 Similarly the repetition of a statement that has already been disproved cannot make it true, no matter how many times it is repeated: it becomes a mantra - but one without truth. "In my opinion, there is no patent on DMSO based delivery systems possible,...it is in the public domain." You've said that before. The facts say otherwise... Message 18609716 "...no drug company owns the patent for DMSO based drugs..."? patft.uspto.gov ...enter the words "dimethyl sulphoxide" in term 1, and "transdermal" in term 2 - 7 patents from 1981 to 1985 - 96 patents from 1986 to 1990 - 274 patents from 1991 to 1995 - 1290 patents from 1996 to 2002 Regards, Jim