Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : DON'T START THE WAR -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: zonder who wrote (13179)	2/26/2003 10:52:36 AM
From: Tom_H_68	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 25898

This was posted just a few moments ago... Message 18629158 Do you not see that there is a link between Iraq and terrorism. >>(2) As I said, Saddam would not sell chemical weapons to Islamist terrorists, because he knows they don't like him and they don't like his regime, and in all likelihood, they would be used against him at the first chance. (If you have really been to the Middle East like you said you have, then you know this is true)<< My example: Me against my brother... My brother and I against you... was used to demonstrate that the Islamic terrorists dislike the US more than they dislike Iraq and given the choice to attack Iraq or the US, I am sure that they would choose to attack the US. Don't you think that if chemical weapons were to exchange hands between (ANY) terrorists that Hussein has enough sense to make an agreement to the effect that those same weapons had better no be used against him. After all, if terrorists turned Iraqi' weapons against Iraq, don't you think that it would be harder to get more weapons????? One more thing - don't question where I have been and what I have done. The unfortunate paradox this situation puts me in forbids me from removing all doubt. tom