SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: aladin who wrote (77789)2/26/2003 2:49:38 PM
From: bacchus_ii  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
but never address the issue of the missing biological and chemical weapons - and none will respond to this post

Because we haven't been offered a credible proof that those weapons ever existed or where not been used in IRAN-IRAQ war. Still the burden of the proof (of a negative) to the defendant.



To: aladin who wrote (77789)2/26/2003 3:11:21 PM
From: JohnM  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
I will say it again - there is a liberal case for war being ignored by the partisans of the left.

And there is a non-Bush case for a non-war with Iraq. And that is, as I just typed to Nadine, that Bush has not made the case that (a) there is a link between Saddam and 9-11, (b) there is a link between Saddam and Al Q, and (c) there is an imminent threat to the US. It's not a hard case to make. The reverse is the hard one.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News