Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: JohnM who wrote (77809)	2/26/2003 2:48:43 PM
From: michael97123	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

"....addrressing global terrorists (note the emphasis on global) such as Al Q." Which terrorists are you excluding then? the Palestinians? If so why would the world not want to deal with pizza bombers? mike

To: JohnM who wrote (77809)	2/26/2003 3:14:37 PM
From: LindyBill	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

addressing global terrorists (note the emphasis on global) such as Al Q. That't the first time you have made that distinction, John. I expected you to come up with it a long time ago. Sorry, it's too late. As I posted to Yiwu, after 911, All Muslim "Freedom Fighters" are now classified as "Terrorists." Holler all you want, ain't gonna change.

To: JohnM who wrote (77809)	2/26/2003 4:49:59 PM
From: Rollcast...	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

The short one is that the world needs, perhaps as never before, institutions larger than national ones. Yes, that would fall under the anti am... err anti unipolarity argument. to engage more seriously than yet done in the issues of the proliferation of nuclear weapons, and to work toward mutually reinforcing cooperative arrangements for addressing global terrorists (note the emphasis on global) such as Al Q. Has the UNSC engaged the disarmament issue in Iraq seriously? nytimes.com ..."Prevention of military action is only possible if the democratic countries of this world work together, and are not split. The best success of Saddam Hussein will be to split the democratic world, and then to laugh about all of us."... Thanks to the "UN and process" - this split is guaranteed for the indefinite future... and so is that "larger than national institution" which "engages more seriously".