To: i-node who wrote (162203 ) 2/27/2003 9:25:21 AM From: Alighieri Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1576346 Where should I begin? With "I never had sexual relations with that woman"? Or with Ms. Garofalo's "there is no evidence that there are missing WMD in Iraq"? Should we start with "Estrada's nomination is being held up because he hasn't disclosed his positions on everything"? What about Hillary's, "We found these billing records, they just appeared out of nowhere"? Or JFK Jr.'s, "I'm not even sure when I last flew on a private jet (answer: A couple hours ago)"? What about Alec Baldwin's "If Bush is elected, I'm moving to France"? Or there is, "The war is about oil" from Dennis Kucinich. You are disfunctional...you truly are. I can go through recent history and emabarass you with scandal after scandal in which a Republican is embroiled. What does that mean, that all Republicans are liars? Of curse not. I mean, seriously man, get some therapy. You sound like you are not very stable. This is Rushism....the world is black and white, all who think unlike me are evil and must be denigrated. Never mind taking the time to be insightful when a few adjectives will do the trick. Liberals are all liars. That's easy...and lazy. The reality is that liberals lie with ease; it is, quite simply, a typical characteristic of a liberal. These lies are what enables the liberal to avoid seeing the black and white of good and evil. The fact that liberals cannot distinguish the absolute, inexcusable evil of Saddam Hussein can be attributed to their persistent blurring of the lines between right and wrong. Your reality maybe. Again, read this garbage. It's the writing of an angry, unstable person. Who has said that Saddam is not evil. What does that have to do with how it is best to deal with him? Al