Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : DON'T START THE WAR -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: HighTech who wrote (13413)	2/26/2003 7:18:48 PM
From: PartyTime	Respond to of 25898

I see. So you're in favor of a war upon a nation of 22 million people of whom 42 percent are children under the age of 15. And, more amazing than this, you're willing to do this based on speculation and already proven faulty and bent-directed intelligence. Regarding speculation, can you tell us how many other sources there are for terrorists to get such dangerous materials? capitolhillblue.com Logically, the test here is not whether we can limit the dangerous materials, because chemical and biological agents can easily be gotten from any number of sources, and not just Iraq. The true test here is to limit the terrorists who will use them. That means having fewer, not more terrorists. Bush's best cheerleader, the individual who most wants him to bomb Saddam and especially his people, is none other than Osama bin Ladin. Hi-Tech, I hate to break it to ya, but there just ain't no high tech weapon strong enough, or good enough, that it can strip people, especially a very large impoverished population of Muslims, of their emotions. Perhaps a better econmic plan might be the better weapon to reduce terrorists.