Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Classic TA Workplace -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: jjstingray who wrote (67520)	2/26/2003 10:51:30 PM
From: At_The_Ask	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 209892

Good post on volatility. To:tyke who wrote (774) From: Dan Duchardt Tuesday, Feb 25, 2003 1:02 AM View Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793 BBs are a useful indication of the expected range of price movement over any time period. You seem to have a pretty good handle on what the BBs are telling you. To the extent that price follows a "normal" distribution, the standard deviation or its multiples relate to the probability of price diverging from the average during the period. For your purposes of trying to estimate the likelihood of price reaching some level within the life of an option, the BBs are meaningful indicators If you think about the definition of "average" and "standard deviation" for a set of data, you realize that the order of the data within the set is of no consequence. What that means for today's average and today's BBs is that the preceding daily prices could have been in any order and the average and BB width would still be the same. For that same set of data, volatility is a measure of the typical day to day fluctuations of price change. You could take the same set of 50 prices and come up with very different HVs depending on how you order the prices within the set. If they are arranged sequentially from highest to lowest or lowest to highest, the day to day changes will be minimized and the volatility will be relatively small compared to a random ordering of the same prices. A contrived arrangement of alternating high and low prices would yield a much higher volatility. I can't find any links to a definition of historical volatility. I remember If found one a couple of years ago, and found a spreadsheet for a Black Scholes calculator that worked with raw price data to find the HV component. What I described for calculating HV is based on my recollection of the old source, confirmed by the spreadsheet calculation. Based on that definition, it becomes clear that volatility is a measure of deviation from LINEARITY of price movement, or more correctly from log-linear movement. You might try to play around with a set of 50 numbers to see how different HV can be when the order is changed. Good explanation of why bb's don't precisely reflect the actual implied volatility in a stock. However I think that maybe if the bb's are tighter than usual over a given period and you are expecting a good move it could imply that the actual volatility reflected in option prices might be lower than if the bb's are expanded. The inverse would be that if the bb's are expanded you might end up with lower prices even when the stock goes your way because the volatility either decreases or stays flat. Any way thats the downside of options. Too much "rocket science".