Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Golden Eagle Int. (MYNG) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: ge-believer who wrote (30665)	2/27/2003 9:49:41 AM
From: Claude Cormier	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 34075

<How about something in the 10,000 ton size range? > Sure. The largest placer conglomerates is the Witwatersrand in SA. Production there was huge. But average grades there were near 9 grams per ton, much higher than the Cangalli conglomerates. geosites.co.za

To: ge-believer who wrote (30665)	2/27/2003 11:12:47 AM
From: steadyasyougo	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 34075

ge-believer, check the link below. Are there only 993 shareholders, i.e. is this up to date? When the good news reaches critical stage, there surely will be a significant number of the 993 in the strong hands category. Am I wrong in assuming that if we have a herd of 1000 to 2000 people suddenly showing up wanting to buy, that there may be a big gap between supply and demand? Maybe 993 is a large number, but to me it is surprisingly small. Even subtracting out what your brother owns or could own of the fully diluted shares, and Mary's and Terry's etc, the average left per shareholder is rather large. Sure implies lots of strong hands. I just wouldn't think an "average" shareholder with 150,000-200,000 shares would flip out at $0.50 or so. otcbb.com When the herd arrives, they're not getting my shares even if it is $1 they offer. It's gonna take a lot more than that. gerald