Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: SilentZ who wrote (162266)	2/27/2003 7:25:37 AM
From: hmaly	Respond to of 1577465

Zo Re.. Well, they ARE spies. And they should be. Iraq lost the right to not be watched. That would depend upon which definition of spy one is using to define spy. ONe definition of spying is to look at someone or something. Another is to find out military secrets, for the purpose of giving them to ones enemies. I would argue that, the inspectors are following the first definition, and Garfanlo is accusing the inspectors of spying, as in giving the US their military secrets. And I would suggest that, if the peaceniks want to claim that the inspectors are spies, in the military sense, then there is no rational to think the inspection process will ever work, because they will always be thought of as hostile spies; not someone to be cooperated with.