Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: gerard mangiardi who wrote (364154)	2/27/2003 8:04:27 AM
From: goldworldnet	Respond to of 769670

It would be wonderful if more people again felt bound to each other after physical union. I think you can agree on this. Ironically, it is the morality of many of those who desire peace who are most offensive to those who oppose us. * * *

To: gerard mangiardi who wrote (364154)	2/27/2003 12:57:36 PM
From: Johannes Pilch	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

Your posts suggest that fornication or rape constitutes some form of common law marriage. Not at all. Both rape and fornication are foreign to human identity and so I do not try to account for and/or protect them as perhaps you do and as civil law does. Rape is no coalition between humans. It is an assault wherein one party infringes upon the natural right of another. All such infringements are wrong and should be punished. Fornication, like homosexuality, bestiality and other aberrant sexual behaviors, has no integrity with human biological identity. Humans are comprised of biological contributions of exactly one man and exactly one woman for the duration of life. Only heterosexual monogamy reflects this most fundamental identity. Human societies have no obligation at all to support what they are not.