Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: SecularBull who wrote (364287)	2/27/2003 1:35:24 PM
From: Lizzie Tudor	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 769670

I don't care about doctors priorities or what they would have to do or anything of the sort, that is a peripheral matter. Stop bringing all this extraneous junk up, it is irrelevant. "Inducing live birth" does not cause a fetus to die. The death occurs when the fetus's lungs cannot accept air or some other medical issue, having to do with its physical state. Just like refusing to donate bone marrow does not cause a child to die... implicitly it does of course. Birth is like that- birth in and of itself is not a life threatening event. That is my understanding- but anyway I told you the argument, now do some research on your own, use legal sites and see what you come up with. No more on this from me.