Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (364308)	2/27/2003 2:07:27 PM
From: Johannes Pilch	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

The economic scenario is your case with the child being left outside. I was told the abortion debate is the medical situation above though. There is no essential difference here. To see this you must strip from your mind false dichotomies of "medical" versus "economic" and think here in essentials. All of it is economic and that it all deals with the choices that sustain (or destroy) life. Both children are placed in environments by their parents that make it virtually impossible for them to survive. In both cases the parents are being negligent, yet the law condemns the parents of one child and literally supports, with funds, the parents of the other. The law is illogical.