Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Dan Rather: Questions He Should Have Asked Saddam -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Rock_nj who wrote (44)	2/27/2003 9:08:15 PM
From: Lazarus_Long	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 74

might invite an invasion by Iran Later, maybe. Not while the US Army was there. And that could have been solved by a mutual defense treaty between Ira and the US or a US guarantee of Iraq's security. Bush was afraid that killing Saddam would lead to anarchy in Iraq Ah, the US made repeated attempts to kill Saddam during the war. Also, we weren't authorized by the UN to do so. So tell, them to sue us. BFD. We mostly fought that war. I doubt that our biggest helper, Britain, would have objected. And we can see now what the UN is worth. Why his WMD are suddenly such a concern that we have to invade is another good question? They have been ever since the war ended in that truce that has never been satisfied. 9/11 or no 9/11, WMD were a concern years ago, but now enough of a concern to invade?!? Because Slick Willie was President? A leper among decent men? A man who couldn't understand what "the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but he truth" means? A man without backbone? I think there's an alterior motive at work here. That's because you are determined to believe that.