Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : DON'T START THE WAR -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Hawkmoon who wrote (13799)	2/28/2003 12:28:36 AM
From: TigerPaw	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 25898

The falacy of your reasoning is to take two possibilities which have greatly unequal probabilities, and treat them as if they are equally likely No apology here, The research made it clear that Saddam only had a theoretical possiblility of a bomb if all of his uranium was used under perfect conditions. The inspectors found the French supplied uranium in it's original containers with no evidence of attempted use. Saddam has never been close to having a bomb, and so it is a falacy to play either/or as if there is some kind of equal chance that he has a bomb or not. The overwhelming evidence says NOT. TP